Figure 2 | Scientific Reports

Figure 2

From: Structural basis for epitope masking and strain specificity of a conserved epitope in an intrinsically disordered malaria vaccine candidate

Figure 2

Crystal structure to 1.2 Å resolution of 6D8 Fv bound to the 9-mer peptide MSP214–22. (A) Helical propensity of synthetic epitope-bearing peptides MSP211–23 and MSP214–22. Both peptides showed ellipticity at 190, 208 and 220 nm, consistent with some helical content in water, with the longer peptide having significantly greater tendency for helical conformation. (B) Crystal structure of MSP214–22 at the paratope cleft formed by the antibody CDRs. (C) MSP214–22 adopts a single turn of helix stabilized by hydrogen bonds with residues Asp31H, Asp32H, Val101H and Asn38L. In solution, Arg22 contacts residues Thr91L and Asn92L while the guanidine group of Arg23 of the peptide bends towards the N-terminus of the peptide, establishing critical hydrogen bonds with Asp32 in the VH chain and the carbonyl of Tyr16. (D) The structure of the lipid-bound form of MSP21–2525 indicating the relative orientation of residues Try16, Arg21 and Arg22. The α-helical configuration of the lipid-bound MSP21–25 removes the backbone flexibility required for Arg22 to access Tyr16, which provides a structural rationale for the lack of binding of mAb 6D8 to MSP2 at the parasite membrane.

Back to article page