Figure 3
From: Multiple levels of linguistic and paralinguistic features contribute to voice recognition
Average performance measures in voice recognition.
A) Voice recognition with non-speech was less accurate than all speech conditions and accuracy in Mandarin was significantly lower than in pseudo-English and English (** denotes p < 0.01). B) Reaction times during the non-speech condition were longer than during speech conditions (* indicates p < 0.05). C) Voice recognition significantly correlated with the order of experimental presentation only in Mandarin, such that performance improved as it was presented later within the experiment. D) Compared to performance in German, voice recognition in Mandarin was worse when it was presented early in the experiment (p < 0.05), whereas performance between the two languages were similar in later blocks.
