Table 2 The surgical outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (OCT).

From: Long-term Surgical Outcomes of Epiretinal Membrane in Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa

Pt no.

Eye

Gender

Age at Surgery (yrs)

Follow-up Time (mos)

PVD

Central Subfield Thickness (μm)

Grading for the EZ appearance

Baseline

Final

Baseline

Final

R

L

R

L

R

L

R

L

1

R

F

57

51

+

552

360

206

365

3

3

3

3

2

R

M

53

51

āˆ’

/

/

284

561

3

3

3

2

3

L

M

73

54

āˆ’

213

336

244

207

1

1

1

1

4

L

M

56

56

āˆ’

548

563

402

86

2

1

2

MH

5

R

F

57

70

āˆ’

370

279

257

255

3

3

3

3

6

L

M

73

71

āˆ’

/

/

277

240

3

3

3

3

7

L

M

38

74

āˆ’

267

376

220

197

3

3

3

3

8

L

M

65

79

āˆ’

/

/

307

299

3

3

3

3

9

R

F

24

80

āˆ’

418

244

135

261

1

3

1

3

10

L

F

30

86

āˆ’

454

473

166

164

2

1

1

1

Ā 

R

F

31

78

āˆ’

525

209

166

164

2

1

1

1

  1. OCT = optical coherence tomography; Pt no. = Patient number; yrs = years; mos = months; PVD = posterior vitreous detachment; EZ = ellipsoid zone; R = right; L = left; F = female; M = male; MH = macular hole.
  2. ā€œ/ā€ā€‰= unknown data.
  3. Grading for the EZ appearance = Grade 1, EZ was not visible; Grade 2, abnormal EZ; and Grade 3, normal EZ.
  4. The bold font indicates the operation eyes.