Table 1 Characteristics of studies on vitamin C intake and pancreatic cancer risk.

From: Association between vitamin C intake and the risk of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies

Study, year

Country

Study design

Participants (cases)

Age (years)

RR (95% CI) for highest versus lowest category

Adjustment for covariates

Howe et al. 1990

Canada

Case-control

754(249)

35–79

0.81(0.51–1.30)

Adjust for caloric and fibre intake, lifetime cigarette consumption.

Baghurst et al. 1991

Australia

Case-control

357(104)

<50-≥80

0.46(0.23–0.94)

Adjust for age; pack-years of smoking, tobacco consumption and viceversa.

Bueno de Mesquita et al. 1991

Netherlands

Case-control

644(164)

35–79

0.79(0.48–1.29)

Adjust for age, sex, response status, total smoking and dietary intake of energy.

Zatonski et al. 1991

Poland

Case-control

305(110)

62.2

0.37(0.13–0.99)

Adjust for cigarette lifetime consumption and calories.

Olsen et al. 1991

United States

Case-control

432(212)

40–84

0.5(0.3–0.9)

Adjusted for total energy, age, cigarette usage, alcohol consumption, respondent-reported history of diabetes mellitus and educational level.

Howe et al. 1992

Europe

Case-control

2471(802)

28–87

0.55(0.39–0.78)

Adjusted for age, sex, nutrient variables (categorical) and lifetime cigarette consumption (continuous).

Kalapothaki et al. 1993

Greece

Case-control

362(181)

Na

0.92(0.73–1.15)

Adjust for age, gender, hospital, pastresidence, years of schooling, cigarette smoking, diabetes mellitus and energy intake.

Stolzenberg-Solomon et al. 2002

Finland

Prospective

27111(163)

50–69

0.91(0.52–1.59)

Adjust for by the residual method and for age and years of smoking, energy-adjusted folate intake and energy-adjusted saturated fat intake.

Lin et al. 2005

Japan

Case-control

327(109)

40–79

0.45(0.22–0.94)

Adjust for age, pack-years of smoking and energy intake.

Anderson et al. 2009

Canada

Case-control

734(422)

<79

0.71(0.51–1.00)

Age-adjusted odds ratio. Age at pancreas cancer diagnosis date for cases and at referent date of 1 January 2003 (midpoint of caserecruitment) for controls.

Gong et al. 2010

United States

Case-control

2226(525)

21–85

0.69(0.51–0.94)

Adjusted for age in 5-year groups, sex and total energy intake, race, education, body mass index, history of diabetes, smoking, physical activity and alcoholconsumption.

Bravi et al. 2011

Italian

Case-control

978(326)

34–80

0.44(0.27–0.73)

Adjusted for age, sex and center, year of interview, education, tobacco smoking and history of diabetes, body mass index and total energy intake.

Heinen et al. 2012

Netherlands

Prospective

120825(423)

55–69

1.00(0.74–1.33)

Adjusted for age, sex, smoking, body mass index, familyhistory of pancreatic cancer, history of diabetes mellitus, intake of energy, red meat, coffee and alcohol.

Banim et al. 2013

UK

Prospective

23658(49)

40–74

0.88(0.41–1.86)

Adjusted for age, sex, smoking, diabetes, total energy intake and body mass index category.

Han et al. 2013

United States

Prospective

77446(162)

50–76

0.89(0.58–1.35)

Adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, education, body mass index, physical activity, cigarette smoking status, total alcohol consumption, family history of pancreatic cancer, history of diabetesand total energy intake.

Jansen et al. 2013

United States

Case-control

1367(983)

31–92

0.51(0.34–0.76)

Adjusted for energy, smoking, BMI, age, sex and drinks of alcohol per week

Jeurnink et al. 2014

Europe

Nested case-control

521468(442)

52.1

0.91(0.55–1.51)

Adjusted for age at blood collection, study center, sex, date of blood collection, time of blood collection, fasting status and hormone use, smoking status, duration and intensity of smoking, cotinine levels, waist circumference and diabetes status..