Table 1 Characteristics of included studies of menarcheal age and endometrial cancer risk.

From: Age at menarche and endometrial cancer risk: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies

First author, publication year [reference], Country, Study design

Cases/subject (age), duration of follow up

Source of cases

Menarcheal age categories (exposure assessment)

RR/HR (95%CI)

Matched/Adjusted factors

Yang et al.28, 2013, USA, CS

1450/114,409 (50–69y), 9.4y

Cancer registry

<13

1.00 (ref)

Age, OC use, menopausal hormone therapy use, parity, BMI, age at menopause, race and smoking status

   

13–14

0.91 (0.82–1.02)

 
   

≥15 (Self-administered questionnaire)

0.80 (0.65–0.97)

 

Dossus et al.21, 2010, Europe, CS

1017/301,601 (35–70y), 8.7y

Cancer registry

<12

1.00 (ref)

Age, center, BMI, physical activity, alcohol, diabetes, smoking status and education

   

12

0.97 (0.80–1.19)

 
   

13

0.78 (0.63–0.95)

 
   

14

0.80 (0.65–0.98)

 
   

≥15 (Self-administered questionnaire)

0.72 (0.58–0.90)

 

Karageorgi et al.29, 2010, USA, CS

778/121,700 (30–55y), 28y

Medical records

≤11

1.00 (ref)

Age, parity, age at first birth, age at last birth, OC duration, postmenopausal hormone use duration, BMI, smoking, diabetes, family history of endometrial cancer and age at menopause

   

12

0.99 (0.81–1.20)

 
   

13

0.80 (0.66–0.98)

 
   

14

0.90 (0.70–1.16)

 
   

≥15 (Self-administered questionnaire)

0.76 (0.55–1.04)

 

Setiawan et al.31, 2007, USA, CS

321/46,933 (45–75y), 7.3y

Cancer registry

≤12

1.00 (ref)

Race/ethnicity, BMI, age at natural menopause, parity, hormone therapy use, OC use, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, family history of endometrial cancer

   

13–14

0.86 (0.68–1.10)

 
   

≥15 (Self-administered questionnaire)

0.85 (0.60–1.22)

 

Wernli et al.9, 2006, China, CS

206/267,400 (≥30y), 10y

Medical records

≤13

1.00 (ref)

Age and parity number

   

14

0.48 (0.28–0.82)

 
   

15

0.73 (0.47–1.16)

 
   

16

0.77 (0.49–1.20)

 
   

≥17 (Self-administered questionnaire)

0.40 (0.25–0.63)

 

Hisada et al.33, 2001, USA, NC-CS

39/194/15,528 (N/A), 27y

Cancer registry

≤11

1.00 (ref)

Age and race

   

12

0.89 (0.18–4.30)

 
   

13

1.44 (0.34–6.09)

 
   

≥14 (Trained interviewer)

0.67 (0.10–4.33)

 

Olson et al.30, 1999, USA, CS

322/24,848 (55–69y), 10y

Cancer registry

≤11

1.00 (ref)

Age

   

11–12

0.7 (0.5–1.2)

 
   

12–13

0.6 (0.4–1.0)

 
   

>14 (Self-administered questionnaire)

0.4 (0.2–0.8)

 

Kvale et al.32, 1988, Norway, CS

420/62,079 (27–69y), 20y

Medical records

≤12

1.00 (ref)

Age at start of follow-up, urban/rural place of residence and parity

   

13

N/A

 
   

14

N/A

 
   

15

N/A

 
   

16

N/A

 
   

≥17 (Self-administered questionnaire)

0.58 (0.39–0.88)

 
  1. RR: relative risk; CI: confidence interval; CS: cohort study; NC-CS: nested case-control study; N/A: not available; BMI: body mass index; OC: oral contraceptive.
  2. Odds ratio and 95% CI calculated from published data using EpiCalc 2000.