Table 4 Summary risk estimates of the association between parity and endometrial cancer risk (parous versus nulliparous).

From: Parity and endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies

 

No of reports

RR (95% CI)

I2 (%)

P for heterogeneity

Overall

42

0.69 (0.65–0.74)

76.9

<0.001

Subgroup analysis

 Study design

  Prospective

7

0.66 (0.60–0.74)

0.0

0.790

  Case–control

34

0.69 (0.64–0.74)

79.7

<0.001

 Location

  Europe

15

0.76 (0.70–0.82)

67.9

<0.001

  America

17

0.71 (0.64–0.78)

66.5

<0.001

  Asia

9

0.53 (0.44–0.63)

58.6

0.013

  International

1

0.73 (0.71–0.76)

 Number of cases

  <200

19

0.68 (0.60–0.76)

57.1

0.001

  ≥200

23

0.70 (0.65–0.75)

83.3

<0.001

 Study publication time

  Earlier than 1992

19

0.74 (0.68–0.82)

63.0

<0.001

  1992–

23

0.66 (0.61–0.71)

82.8

<0.001

 Estimate adjustment

  Yes

33

0.68 (0.63–0.73)

79.4

<0.001

  No

9

0.72 (0.65–0.81)

52.1

0.033

 Estimate adjusted for age

  Yes

32

0.68 (0.63–0.73)

80.1

<0.001

  No

10

0.73 (0.66–0.81)

47.3

0.048

 Estimate adjusted for BMI

  Yes

10

0.63 (0.51–0.77)

85.7

<0.001

  No

32

0.71 (0.67–0.75)

72.7

<0.001

 Estimate adjusted for smoking

  Yes

9

0.72 (0.61–0.85)

75.5

<0.001

  No

33

0.68 (0.64–0.73)

77.8

<0.001

 Estimate adjusted for age, BMI and smoking

  Yes

8

0.71 (0.59–0.85)

78.5

<0.001

  No

34

0.69 (0.64–0.73)

77.1

<0.001

 Sources of controls

  Population based

18

0.66 (0.60–0.73)

82.9

<0.001

  Hospital based

16

0.72 (0.63–0.83)

76.3

<0.001

 Study quality

  high

31

0.67 (0.62–0.73)

79.5

<0.001

  low

10

0.72 (0.63–0.81)

65.7

0.002