Table 6 Summary risk estimates of the association between parity and endometrial cancer risk (parity number of 2 versus nulliparous).

From: Parity and endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies

 

No of reports

RR (95% CI)

I2 (%)

P for heterogeneity

Parity number of 2 vs. nulliparous

13

0.62 (0.53–0.74)

92.1

<0.001

Subgroup analysis

 Study design

  Prospective

2

0.54 (0.31–0.93)

92.7

<0.001

  Case-control

10

0.63 (0.53–0.76)

68.8

0.001

 Location

  Europe

7

0.61 (0.43–0.86)

95.3

<0.001

  America

3

0.66 (0.54–0.80)

0.0

0.835

  Asia

2

0.49 (0.31–0.78)

52.7

0.146

  International

1

0.78 (0.75–0.81)

 Number of cases

  <200

5

0.60 (0. 48–0.74)

16.2

0.312

  ≥200

8

0.64 (0.52–0.78)

95.1

<0.001

 Study publication time

  Earlier than 1992

5

0.68 (0.58–0.79)

0.0

0.957

  1992-

8

0.59 (0.47–0.74)

95.4

<0.001

 Estimate adjustment

  Yes

11

0.59 (0.46–0.77)

92.5

<0.001

  No

2

0.78 (0.75–0.81)

0.0

0.417

 Estimate adjusted for age

  Yes

11

0.59 (0.46–0.77)

92.5

<0.001

  No

2

0.78 (0.75–0.81)

0.0

0.417

 Estimate adjusted for BMI

  Yes

4

0.50 (0.29–0.85)

79.5

0.002

  No

9

0.66 (0.54–0.79)

94.0

<0.001

 Estimate adjusted for smoking

  Yes

3

0.55 (0.27–1.09)

80.1

0.007

  No

10

0.63 (0.53–0.76)

93.7

<0.001

 Estimate adjusted for age, BMI and smoking

  Yes

3

0.55 (0.27–1.09)

80.1

0.007

  No

10

0.63 (0.53–0.76)

93.7

<0.001

 Study quality

  high

9

0.56 (0.44–0.73)

82.1

<0.001

  low

3

0.74 (0.59–0.92)

52.1

0.124