Table 3 Multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) of incident components of the metabolic syndrome by quartiles (Q) of toenail chromium levels, the CARDIA study, 1987 to 2010*.

From: Chromium exposure and incidence of metabolic syndrome among American young adults over a 23-year follow-up: the CARDIA Trace Element Study

 

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

P for trend

Glucose (n = 3,992)

 Chromium- ppm

<0.265

0.265–0.549

0.550–1.215

≥1.216

 

 No. of participants

999

997

998

998

 

 No. of events

172

178

157

147

 

 Incidence rate/1000 person years

9.71

9.69

8.51

8.03

 

  Model 1

1 (Referent)

0.97 (0.79–1.20)

0.89 (0.71–1.11)

0.87 (0.70–1.10)

0.269

  Model 2

1 (Referent)

0.88 (0.71–1.09)

0.87 (0.70–1.08)

0.85 (0.68–1.07)

0.376

  Model 3§

1 (Referent)

0.91 (0.74–1.13)

0.85 (0.68–1.05)

0.87 (0.69–1.08)

0.395

Blood pressure (n = 3,647)

 Chromium- ppm

<0.266

0.266–0.551

0.552–1.232

≥1.233

 

 No. of participants

911

912

913

911

 

 No. of events

364

387

344

351

 

 Incidence rate/1000 person years

23.81

24.91

21.73

21.79

 

  Model 1

1 (Referent)

1.07 (0.92–1.23)

0.99 (0.85–1.15)

1.03 (0.89–1.20)

0.518

  Model 2

1 (Referent)

1.03 (0.89–1.19)

0.98 (0.85–1.14)

1.05 (0.90–1.22)

0.750

  Model 3§

1 (Referent)

1.07 (0.93–1.24)

0.96 (0.83–1.12)

1.08 (0.93–1.25)

0.667

Waist circumference (n = 3,536)

 Chromium- ppm

<0.263

0.263–0.550

0.551–1.231

≥1.232

 

 No. of participants

884

884

884

884

 

 No. of events

335

363

331

331

 

 Incidence rate/1000 person years

22.78

24.79

21.71

21.78

 

  Model 1

1 (Referent)

1.11 (0.95–1.29)

0.98 (0.84–1.14)

0.98 (0.84–1.15)

0.145

  Model 2

1 (Referent)

1.15 (0.99–1.34)

0.98 (0.84–1.14)

0.94 (0.80–1.10)

0.234

  Model 3§

1 (Referent)

1.23 (1.06–1.43)

1.07 (0.92–1.26)

1.09 (0.93–1.28)

0.674

Triglycerides (n = 3,563)

 Chromium- ppm

<0.266

0.266–0.553

0.554–1.232

≥1.234

 

 No. of participants

890

891

891

891

 

 No. of events

281

268

255

220

 

 Incidence rate/1000 person years

18.69

17.08

16.08

13.75

 

  Model 1

1 (Referent)

0.94 (0.79–1.11)

0.87 (0.73–1.03)

0.78 (0.65–0.94)

0.029

  Model 2

1 (Referent)

0.96 (0.81–1.13)

0.88 (0.74–1.04)

0.79 (0.66–0.95)

0.040

  Model 3§

1 (Referent)

0.97 (0.82–1.14)

0.85 (0.72–1.01)

0.82 (0.68–0.98)

0.045

HDL cholesterol (n = 2,989)

 Chromium- ppm

<0.269

0.269–0.561

0.562–1.244

≥1.245

 

 No. of participants

748

746

748

747

 

 No. of events

362

316

329

277

 

 Incidence rate/1000 person years

36.30

28.84

29.62

23.95

 

  Model 1

1 (Referent)

0.83 (0.71–0.97)

0.86 (0.74–0.997)

0.70 (0.60–0.83)

0.004

  Model 2

1 (Referent)

0.83 (0.71–0.97)

0.87 (0.74–1.01)

0.70 (0.59–0.82)

0.003

  Model 3§

1 (Referent)

0.84 (0.72–0.98)

0.93 (0.80–1.08)

0.75 (0.64–0.88)

0.030

  1. Abbreviations: CARDIA, Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults; CI, Confidence interval; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HR, Hazard ratio; Q, quartile.
  2. *All models were constructed using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.
  3. P for trend was examined by using the continuous variable of toenail chromium levels.
  4. Model 1 and model 2: adjusted for covariates cited in the footnote of Table 2.
  5. §Model 3: model 2 with additional adjustment for the corresponding individual component at baseline.