Figure 3
From: Two Distinct Moral Mechanisms for Ascribing and Denying Intentionality
Moral judgments of blame and credit serve as inputs for intentionality ascription in both Ascription and Denial.
Moral judgment of blame served as a significant mediator of the relationship between emotional reaction and intentionality in negative conditions (Indirect Effect Estimate (Δβ) = 0.30; 95% confidence interval = [0.18, 0.43]). Moral judgment of credit served as a significant mediator of the relationship between statistical normativity and intentionality in positive conditions (Indirect Effect Estimate (Δβ) = 0.10; 95% confidence interval = [0.05, 0.13]; Supplementary Table 6).
