Table 2 Associations between cerebrovascular disease, Aβ isoforms and amyloid PET per diagnostic group.

From: Cerebral white matter lesions – associations with Aβ isoforms and amyloid PET

Group

Parameter

WML volume ± 95% CI

Fazekas score ± 95% CI

Lacunes ± 95% CI

Cognitively

CSF Aβ38

−0.151 **

−0.260

−0.042

−0.071

−0.191

0.048

−0.254

−1.369

0.861

healthy

CSF Aβ40

−0.118 *

−0.228

−0.008

−0.058

−0.178

0.061

−0.363

−1.940

1.213

elderly

CSF Aβ42

−0.075

−0.185

0.036

0.017

−0.103

0.137

−0.795

−2.406

0.815

 

Composite SUVR

0.037

−0.137

0.210

−0.057

−0.241

0.127

0.570

−2.911

4.052

Subjective

CSF Aβ38

−0.211 **

−0.341

−0.081

−0.170 *

−0.312

−0.028

2.306

−0.317

−0.030

cognitive

CSF Aβ40

−0.243 ***

−0.371

−0.115

−0.197 **

−0.337

−0.057

1.144

−0.309

−0.020

deficit

CSF Aβ42

−0.079

−0.213

0.055

−0.066

−0.211

0.079

0.976

−0.154

0.142

 

Composite SUVR

0.099

−0.075

0.273

0.070

−0.118

0.257

−0.686

−0.187

0.231

Mild

CSF Aβ38

−0.264 ***

−0.396

−0.133

−0.174 *

−0.317

−0.030

−1.947 *

−3.655

−0.239

cognitive

CSF Aβ40

−0.286 ***

−0.417

−0.155

−0.164 *

−0.309

−0.020

−1.018

−2.312

0.276

impairment

CSF Aβ42

0.000

−0.138

0.138

−0.006

−0.154

0.142

0.715

−0.501

1.931

 

Composite SUVR

−0.028

−0.226

0.170

0.022

−0.187

0.231

0.149

−2.755

3.052

PD−patients

CSF Aβ38

−0.181 **

−0.310

−0.053

−0.188 *

−0.365

−0.011

NA

  
 

CSF Aβ40

−0.185 **

−0.314

−0.056

−0.175

−0.225

−0.125

NA

  
 

CSF Aβ42

−0.066

−0.204

0.072

0.010

0.386

−0.366

NA

  

AD−patients

CSF Aβ38

NA

  

−0.258 *

−0.447

−0.070

NA

  
 

CSF Aβ40

NA

  

−0.299 **

−0.485

−0.113

NA

  
 

CSF Aβ42

NA

  

−0.225 *

−0.413

−0.038

NA

  
  1. Values represent standardized beta (linear regression, WML volume and total Fazekas score) and Beta (logistic regression, lacunes) with 95% confidence intervals; prior to analysis, the natural logarithm of parameters was calculated where appropriate in order to ensure normal distribution. Values are corrected for age, gender and hippocampal volume; the latter was determined using Adaboost, the mean value of the left and right hippocampus was normalized using the scaling factor provided by this software to account for head size differences.
  2. In the PD and AD groups, 2.3% and 3.6% of the subjects had lacunes and the association between CSF Aβ species and lacunes was not analyzed. Data on WML volume were not available for the AD group, where imaging mainly was performed using CT.
  3. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.0125, ***p > 0.001.
  4. Only p−values < 0.0125 should be considered significant according to Bonferroni−adjustment.