Table 2 Estimation of carbon density and storage of Chinese grasslands using three different grassland classifications (different scales).

From: Carbon storage in Chinese grassland ecosystems: Influence of different integrative methods

Grassland type

groups

Area (106ha)

C density (kg C m−2)

C storage (Pg C)

CV

AGBC

BGBC

SOC

Ecosystem

AGBC

BGBC

SOC

Ecosystem

(%)

Steppe

138.20

0.059a†

0.354a

6.497ac

6.910ac

0.081

0.489

8.979

9.549

5.2

(0.010)

(0.109)

(0.474)

(0.356)

(0.013)

(0.151)

(0.655)

(0.492)

 

Meadow

119.19

0.067a

0.508b

11.633b

12.208b

0.080

0.605

13.866

14.551

5.5

(0.008)

(0.041)

(0.622)

(0.668)

(0.009)

(0.049)

(0.741)

(0.797)

 

Desert

61.61

0.048a

0.075c

5.617a

5.740a

0.029

0.047

3.460

3.536

7.6

(0.008)

(0.021)

(0.460)

(0.438)

(0.005)

(0.013)

(0.283)

(0.270)

 

Shrub-tussock

34.77

0.139b

0.718 d

7.292c

8.148c

0.048

0.250

2.535

2.833

13.0

(0.022)

(0.022)

(1.013)

(1.057)

(0.008)

(0.008)

(0.352)

(0.367)

 

Total

353.77

0.078

0.414

7.760

8.251

0.239

1.390

28.841

30.470

2.2

(0.006)

(0.041)

(0.157)

(0.182)

(0.018)

(0.204)

(0.135)

(0.283)

 
  1. Data represent the mean and standard deviation (parentheses); data with the same lower letter in the same column indicate no significant differences at the P = 0.05 level.
  2. AGBC, carbon density of the above-ground biomass; BGBC, carbon density of the below-ground biomass.