Table 3 Meta-regression and stratified analysis of pooled hazard ratios of R1 resection for disease-free survival.

From: Prognostic role of microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Stratified analysis

No. of studies

No. of patients

Pooled HR (95% CI)

Heterogeneity

Meta-regression

Fixed

Random

I2

p-value

Residual I2

p-value

Overall

12

1905

1.567 (1.246–1.969)

1.596 (1.128–2.258)

37.5%

0.091*

  

Adjuvant imatinib treatment

      

34.47%

0.252

Yes

5

717

1.193 (0.784–1.815)

1.308 (0.583–2.935)

53.2%

0.074*

  

No

7

1188

1.758 (1.338–2.310)

1.785 (1.298–2.456)

11.3%

0.343

  

Sample size

      

40.36%

0.523

>100

5

1432

1.495 (1.161–1.924)

1.472 (1.024–2.116)

39.6%

0.157

  

<100

7

473

1.940 (1.132–3.325)

1.897 (0.922–3.902)

41.5%

0.115

  
  1. HR, hazard ratios; CI, confidence interval; Fixed, fixed-effects model; Random, random-effects model; *indicating heterogeneity.