Table 1 Geographic origin, sample codes and sizes, haplotype frequencies and population genetic parameters estimated based on four molecular markers in eleven populations of Mel-13 and fourteen populations of M. eohespera included for analysis.

From: High inbreeding, limited recombination and divergent evolutionary patterns between two sympatric morel species in China

No.

populations locality

Code

N

Longitude

Latitude

Altitude (m)

Haplotypes (no. of individuals)

Haploid diversity(Hd)

nucleotype diversity(Ï€)

 

Mel-13

        

1

Zhaosu, Xinjiang

XJZS

9

80.35

42.41

2630

6[H4(2), H6(1), H7(3), H10(1), H18(1), H22(1)]

0.889

0.00083

2

Urumchi, Xinjiang

XJWLMQ

10

86.59

43.3

1490

3[H3(1), H7(8), H8(1)]

0.378

0.00021

3

Zhamashi, Qinghai

QHZM

12

100.03

38.12

2744

1[H23(12)]

0

0

4

Minhe, Qinghai

QHMH

14

102.48

36.19

1970

4[H11(7), H20(2), H23(4), H25(1)]

0.6923

0.0006

5

Babao, Qinghai

QHBB

15

100.14

38.1

2746

3[H4(7), H13(2), H20(6)]

0.648

0.00048

6

Zhugu, Qinghai

QHZG

20

102.06

37.1

3100

5[H4(11), H12(1), H20(2), H23(5), H29(1)]

0.653

0.00073

7

Fangshan, Shanxi

SXFS

10

111.21

37.49

1619

6[H1(2), H2(1), H5(3), H26(1), H27(1), H28(2)]

0.889

0.00115

8

Fu, Shaanxi

SXYA

9

109.22

35.59

938

5[H7(2), H18(1), H22(4), H23(1), H24(1)]

0.806

0.00077

9

Jiuzhaigou, Sichuan

SCJZ

10

103.55

33.15

2435

4[H19(2), H20(1), H22(6), H24(1)]

0.644

0.00034

10

Maerkang, Sichuan

SCMEK

10

102.37

31.52

3358

4[H14(1), H15(3), H16(2), H17(4)]

0.7778

0.00017

11

Laojunshan, Yunnan

YNLJS

5

99.27

27.11

2555

2[H9(1), H24(4)]

0.4

0.00045

 

M. eohespera

        

1

Zhaosu, Xinjiang

XJZS

15

80.35

42.41

2630

6 [H3(1), H8(1), H12(1), H22(8), H25(1), H30(3)]

0.705

0.00241

2

Urumchi, Xinjiang

XJWLMQ

6

86.59

43.3

1490

4[H3(1), H22(2), H30(2), H33(1)]

0.867

0.00318

3

Shangri-La, Yunnan

YNGZ

6

99.46

28.01

3128

2[H3(2), H22(4)]

0.533

0.0002

4

Ranwu, Xizang

XZRW

19

96.4

29.29

3900

10[H1(1), H6(1), H7(1), H9(1), H10(7), H11(1), H13(3), H15(2), H22(1), H23(1)]

0.854

0.00236

5

Lulang, Xizang

XZLL

5

94.44

29.46

3472

4[H2(1), H3(1), H20(1), H21(2)]

0.9

0.00242

6

Banma, Qinghai

QHBM

18

100.49

32.88

3000

7[H3(4), H9(1), H18(2),H19(8), H21(1), H30(1), H31(1)]

0.857

0.0008

7

Babao, Qinghai

QHBB

10

100.14

38.1

3476

4[H16(3), H17(5), H22(1), H24(1)]

0.771

0.00178

8

Minhe, Qinghai

QHMH

13

102.48

36.19

2746

5[H3(2), H17(5), H22(4), H26(1), H28(1)]

0.711

0.00057

9

Hongyuan, Sichuan

SCSJS

8

102.36

32

1970

3[H3(4), H5(1), H22(3)]

0.782

0.00077

10

Tianzhu, Gansu

GSTZ

15

102.84

37.24

3354

7[H3(1), H14(3), H21(2), H22(5), H24(2), H25(1), H32(1)]

0.679

0.003

11

Diebu, Gansu

GSDB

11

103.13

34.03

2387

3[H3(3), H22(7), H27(1)]

0.564

0.00044

12

Zhouqu, Gansu

GSZQ

9

104.22

33.45

1369

3[H3(1), H22(7), H29(1)]

0.417

0.00042

13

Malu, Gansu

GSML

11

103.31

34.5

2811

4[H3(2), H4(1), H5(1), H22(7)]

0.6

0.00033

14

Muer, Gansu

GSZN

10

103.29

34.34

2780

3[H3(2), H5(4), H22(4)]

0.711

0.0004

Back to article page