Figure 3
From: Light-evoked hyperpolarization and silencing of neurons by conjugated polymers

Light stimulation of primary hippocampal neurons grown on P3HT induces membrane hyperpolarization.
(a) Analysis of the distribution of neurons grown on either glass:P3HT or glass and responding with a decreased, increased or stable firing rate during the light pulse (Glass:P3HT vs Glass: decreasing 55.56% vs 0.00%; stable 37.04% vs 100.00%, increasing 7.40% vs 0.00%). The percentage of cell showing a decrease during the pulse on glass:P3HT is statistically significant with respect to those on glass (p < 0.0001, Fisher’s test). For neurons on glass:P3HT showing a decrease in the firing rate during the light pulse, the distribution of the response after the pulse is also described as part of the whole (decreasing 13.33%; stable 20.00%, increasing 66.67%). (b) Mean (±sem) hyperpolarization amplitude recorded in neurons grown on glass:P3HT (grey and black bars) or glass (white bar) in the presence of the synaptic blockers AP5/CNQX/PTX (glass:P3HT, −5.74 ± 0.71 mV, n = 27; glass:P3HT with blockers, −5.62 ± 1.55 mV, n = 14; Glass, −1.08 ± 0.10 mV, n = 14; Glass:P3HT vs Glass ****p < 0.0001, Glass:P3HT Blockers vs Glass ****p < 0.0001, Glass:P3HT vs Glass:P3HT Blockers p > 0.9999; Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison test). (c) Linear correlation between the hyperpolarization amplitude during illumination and the firing rate after illumination in individual neurons grown on glass:P3HT (Pearson’s correlation coefficient r = 0.69, n = 27; p < 0.001). (d) Amplitude of the hyperpolarization response to 15 consecutive stimulations (green bars) performed at 0.1 Hz. Potential traces were averaged over the recorded cells on glass:P3HT (n = 27). Left panel: full traces for sweeps 1, 2 and 15. Right panel: average hyperpolarization amplitude of cells grown onto glass:P3HT over the repeated stimulations (sweeps 1–15).