Table 4 Probability distribution of orientations corrected using the proposed method (Case II).
From: A novel method for correcting scanline-observational bias of discontinuity orientation
Sample size | Dip direction (°) | Dip angle (°) |
|---|---|---|
50 | N (276.4, 18.22) | N (74.9, 16.92) |
100 | N (277.0, 17.52) | N (75.6, 16.02) |
150 | N (279.0, 17.52) | N (76.0, 15.62) |
200 | N (278.5, 17.82) | N (76.9, 15.22) |
300 | N (277.3, 18.02) | N (76.8, 15.22) |
500 | N (277.3, 17.82) | N (76.7, 15.32) |
1,000 | N (277.6, 18.02) | N (76.0, 15.32) |
