Table 2 Hierarchical analyses of molecular variance (AMOVA) for 18 L. chinensis populations.

From: What drives phenotypic divergence in Leymus chinensis (Poaceae) on large-scale gradient, climate or genetic differentiation?

Groups

Data set

Source of variation

d.f.

Variance components

Percentage variation

None

All

Among populations within groups

17

0.274

7.28**

  

Within populations

522

3.491

92.72**

Clusters

East vs. West

Among groups

1

0.239

6.16**

  

Among populations within groups

16

0.149

3.85**

  

Within populations

552

3.491

89.99**

Vegetation

M–T–D

Among groups

2

0.170

4.44**

  

Among populations within groups

15

0.177

4.62**

  

Within populations

552

3.491

90.94**

Soil pH

Nearly neutral vs. Alkaline

Among groups

1

0.013

0.33ns

  

Among populations within groups

16

0.268

7.10**

  

Within populations

552

3.491

92.57**

  1. M: meadow, T: typical steppe and D: desert steppe, East (01–10 sites), West (11–18 sites), Nearly neutral (7.0 < pH ≤ 8.0), Alkaline (pH > 8.0). **P < 0.01, ns: not significant in each hierarchical analysis.