Table 1 Results from “best” model selection procedure presented for each number of predictor variables of specific species at the phylum and class level (Relative abundance > 1%).
Phylum level | Class level | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number variables | R | Predictor variables | Number variables | R | Predictor variables |
Global Test | Ra = 0.417 | Pc = 3.3% | Global Test | Rb = 0.496 | Pd = 0.9% |
1 | 0.417 | DON | 1 | 0.448 | DON |
2 | 0.371 | DON, MBN | 2 | 0.496 | DON, MBN |
2 | 0.337 | TN, DON | 2 | 0.377 | TN, DON |
2 | 0.319 | AN, DON | 2 | 0.376 | AN, DON |
2 | 0.196 | NN, DON | 3 | 0.470 | AN, DON, MBN |
3 | 0.354 | AN, DON, MBN | 3 | 0.385 | TN, DON, MBN |
3 | 0.300 | TN, DON, MBN | 3 | 0.339 | NN, DON, MBN |
3 | 0.271 | TN, AN, DON | 3 | 0.304 | TN, AN, DON |
3 | 0.225 | NN, DON, MBN | 4 | 0.321 | TN, AN, DON, MBN |
4 | 0.229 | TN, AN, DON, MBN | 4 | 0.308 | AN, NN, DON, MBN |
5 | 0.117 | TN, AN, NN, DON, MBN | 5 | 0.251 | TN, AN, NN, DON, MBN |
