Figure 2: Performance increased with the number of frames and decreased with elapsed time after encoding. | Scientific Reports

Figure 2: Performance increased with the number of frames and decreased with elapsed time after encoding.

From: Predicting episodic memory formation for movie events

Figure 2

(A) Overall performance (mean ± SD, n = 41 subjects). There was no significant difference in overall performance between target trials (T) or foil trials (F) (non-parametric permutation test, p = 0.17). (B) Performance increased with the number of frames in the shot (r = 0.97, p < 10−10). Bin size = 30 frames; results are shown in the center of each bin. (C) Performance for shots decreased with elapsed time after encoding (r = −0.96, p = 0.001). Note that the scale on the x-axis is not linear in time (test points are shown at equidistant intervals along the x-axis). (D) Same as (C), showing performance for individual frames (r = −0.86, p = 0.018).

Back to article page