Scientific Reports 6: Article number: 29599; published online: 14 July 2016; updated: 24 August 2016
This Article contains an error in the legend of Table 1.
“Results are computed for the entire 3150 days in DJF (black values) and for the 25 HW days selected in DJF (bold italic) during 1979–2014,”
should read:
“Results are computed for the entire 3150 days in DJF (black values) and for the 25 HW days selected in DJF (green values) during 1979–2014,”
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/srep29599
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Boschat, G., Simmonds, I., Purich, A. et al. Erratum: On the use of composite analyses to form physical hypotheses: An example from heat wave – SST associations. Sci Rep 6, 31676 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31676
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31676
