Table 3 Hazard ratios(HR) with 95% confidence intervals(CI) for breast cancer incidence according to psychological item responses.

From: The influence of personality and perceived stress on the development of breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of 29,098 Japanese women

Response to questions

No. of women

Observed person-years

No. of cases

Age-adjusted

Multivariate-adjusteda

HR

95%CI

HR

95%CI

Having “ikigai”

 Disagree

2,068

25,355

15

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Neither

14,505

185,952

114

1.03

0.61–1.77

1.02

0.59–1.75

 Agree

9,770

125,897

61

0.80

0.46–1.41

0.77

0.43–1.37

 Agree strongly

2,755

34,952

19

0.90

0.46–1.78

0.81

0.41–1.62

Decisiveness

 Disagree

3155

38,349

18

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Neither

19,206

247,330

140

1.19

0.73–1.94

1.18

0.72–1.94

 Agree

6,737

86,477

51

1.21

0.71–2.08

1.07

0.62–1.85

Ease of anger

 Disagree

4,171

51,898

22

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Neither

21,013

270,672

163

1.38

0.88–2.16

1.41

0.91–2.21

 Agree

3,914

49,585

24

1.08

0.61–1.94

0.98

0.55–1.76

Perceived stress

 Disagree

4,730

57,634

28

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Neither

18,208

235,880

128

1.11

0.74–1.67

1.21

0.80–1.82

 Agree

3,214

38,859

33

1.66

1.00–2.76

1.71

1.02–2.85

 Agree strongly

2,946

39,782

20

1.00

0.56–1.78

1.00

0.56–1.78

  1. aAdjusted for age, study area, educational level, family history of breast cancer, age at menarche, age at menopause, age at first birth, parity, use of exogenous female hormone, alcohol drinking, consumption of green leafy vegetables, daily walking, exercise, sedentary work, height and body mass index