Table 2 Performance comparisons between ultrasound small-window entropy and Nakagami imaging in classifying benign and malignant breast tumors.
From: Small-window parametric imaging based on information entropy for ultrasound tissue characterization
Methodology | Small-window ultrasound entropy imaging | Nakagami statistical parametric imaging | |
---|---|---|---|
Median (IQR) of the Nakagami parameter | Benign | 4.86 (4.57–4.96) | 0.59 (0.46–0.67) |
Malignant | 4.29 (3.87–4.51) | 0.38 (0.25–0.53) | |
Dynamic range of the parameter | 1.73–5.09 | 0.24–0.87 | |
Cutoff value | 4.52 | 0.47 | |
Sensitivity% | 76.66% | 70.00% | |
Specificity% | 81.81% | 69.69% | |
Accuracy% | 79.36% | 69.84% | |
LR+ | 4.21 | 2.31 | |
LR− | 0.28 | 0.43 | |
PPV% | 79.31 | 67.74 | |
NPV% | 79.41 | 71.87 | |
AUROC (95% CI) | 0.89 (0.80–0.97) | 0.79 (0.67–0.90) |