Table 2 Recovery studies of real water samples spiked with various Cu2+ concentrations, comparing the proposed colourimetric method with ICP-OES analyses.

From: Multipath colourimetric assay for copper(II) ions utilizing MarR functionalized gold nanoparticles

Sample

Cu2+ (μM)

The proposed method

ICP-OES

UV-vis

Smartphone-based approach

Measured ± SD a (μM)

Recovery b (%)

CV c (%)

Measured ± SD a (μM)

Recovery b (%)

CV c (%)

Measured ± SD a (μM)

Recovery b (%)

CV c (%)

Tap water

4

3.66 ± 0.19

91.50

5.19

3.81 ± 0.65

95.25

17.0

4.02 ± 0.24

100.50

5.97

8

8.27 ± 0.54

103.38

6.53

8.02 ± 0.49

100.25

6.11

8.65 ± 0.63

108.13

7.30

Bottled water

4

4.26 ± 0.24

106.50

5.63

4.42 ± 0.25

110.50

5.66

4.13 ± 0.16

103.25

3.87

8

8.06 ± 0.41

100.75

5.09

8.21 ± 0.28

102.63

3.41

8.35 ± 0.53

104.37

6.35

River water

4

3.95 ± 0.15

98.75

3.80

3.61 ± 0.35

90.25

9.70

4.30 ± 0.17

107.50

3.95

8

7.41 ± 0.39

92.62

5.26

7.71 ± 0.50

96.38

6.50

8.19 ± 0.39

102.37

4.76

  1. aMean measured concentration of three replicates ± standard deviation.
  2. bMean recovery (%) = 100 × (cmean measured/cadded).
  3. cCoefficient of Variation of three determinations.