Table 2 Estimates of degree of mate choice by males and females of the rice (R) and water-oat (W) populations of Chilo suppressalis in mate choice tests after altering the photoperiod of one population to more closely synchronize its mating activity with that of the other.
Mating situation | PTI | Value | SD | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
No choice | PTIRR | 0.91 | 0.12 | 0.436 |
PTIRW | 0.89 | 0.12 | 0.329 | |
PTIWR | 1.04 | 0.13 | 0.810 | |
PTIWW | 1.16 | 0.13 | 0.235 | |
Female choice | PTIRR | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.920 |
PTIRW | 0.81 | 0.17 | 0.249 | |
PTIWR | 0.98 | 0.18 | 0.876 | |
PTIWW | 1.19 | 0.18 | 0.288 | |
Male choice | PTIRR | 0.95 | 0.17 | 0.723 |
PTIRW | 1.11 | 0.17 | 0.603 | |
PTIWR | 0.76 | 0.15 | 0.111 | |
PTIWW | 1.18 | 0.18 | 0.326 | |
Multiple choice | PTIRR | 0.95 | 0.17 | 0.694 |
PTIRW | 0.91 | 0.17 | 0.530 | |
PTIWR | 0.95 | 0.17 | 0.706 | |
PTIWW | 1.20 | 0.19 | 0.311 |