Table 2 Estimates of degree of mate choice by males and females of the rice (R) and water-oat (W) populations of Chilo suppressalis in mate choice tests after altering the photoperiod of one population to more closely synchronize its mating activity with that of the other.

From: Difference in diel mating time contributes to assortative mating between host plant-associated populations of Chilo suppressalis

Mating situation

PTI

Value

SD

P

No choice

PTIRR

0.91

0.12

0.436

PTIRW

0.89

0.12

0.329

PTIWR

1.04

0.13

0.810

PTIWW

1.16

0.13

0.235

Female choice

PTIRR

1.02

0.18

0.920

PTIRW

0.81

0.17

0.249

PTIWR

0.98

0.18

0.876

PTIWW

1.19

0.18

0.288

Male choice

PTIRR

0.95

0.17

0.723

PTIRW

1.11

0.17

0.603

PTIWR

0.76

0.15

0.111

PTIWW

1.18

0.18

0.326

Multiple choice

PTIRR

0.95

0.17

0.694

PTIRW

0.91

0.17

0.530

PTIWR

0.95

0.17

0.706

PTIWW

1.20

0.19

0.311

  1. Table show PTI coefficients (estimates of mating preference) and their standard deviation (SD) for each mating pair combination. The software JMATING was used to calculate the coefficients, their standard deviations, and their significance (probability of rejecting the null hypothesis) by resampling the observed values 10,000 times (see Materials and Methods). RR represents a R♀ × R♂ mating, WW represents a W♀ × W♂ mating, RW represents a R♀ × W♂ mating and WR represents a W♀ × R♂ mating.