Table 6 Comparison of conjunctival hemodynamic descriptors in venules between C and DR subjects in unadjusted (Model 1) and adjusted (Model 2) models.
From: Assessment of Conjunctival Microvascular Hemodynamics in Stages of Diabetic Microvasculopathy
D (μm) | V (mm/s) | Q (pl/s) | WSR (s−1) | WSS (dyne /cm2) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | P | β | P | β | P | β | P | β | P | |
Intercept | 20 | <0.001 | 0.59 | <0.001 | 173 | <0.001 | 183 | <0.001 | 4.8 | <0.001 |
Model 1: DR Stage Effect* | ||||||||||
C | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
NDR | 1.2 | 0.03 | −0.05 | 0.2 | 5 | 0.8 | −29 | 0.01 | −1.1 | 0.001 |
NPDR | 1.4 | 0.02 | −0.01 | 0.7 | 25 | 0.1 | −19 | 0.1 | −0.9 | 0.008 |
PDR | 0.4 | 0.52 | −0.06 | 0.1 | 4 | 0.8 | −29 | 0.02 | −1.2 | <0.001 |
Intercept | 19 | <0.001 | 0.49 | 0.004 | 151 | 0.05 | 185 | 0.001 | 3.4 | 0.03 |
Model 2: DR Stage Effect** | ||||||||||
C | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
NDR | 1.4 | 0.03 | −0.06 | 0.2 | 7 | 0.7 | −33 | 0.01 | −1.1 | 0.004 |
NPDR | 2.1 | 0.006 | −0.03 | 0.6 | 26 | 0.2 | −29 | 0.05 | −1.1 | 0.02 |
PDR | 1.1 | 0.19 | −0.11 | 0.04 | −6 | 0.8 | −47 | 0.003 | −1.4 | 0.002 |