Table 3 Differential metabolites for discrimination between HG BC patients and LG BC patients.

From: Three serum metabolite signatures for diagnosing low-grade and high-grade bladder cancer

No.

tR(min)

m/za

Formula

Metabolitesb

VIPe

p valuef

FCg

AUCh

sensitivity (%)

specificity (%)

1

0.66

296.0661

C8H14N3O7P

5-Aminoimidazole ribonucleotidec

1.71

1.79 × 10−8

1.34

0.79(0.68–0.89)

0.73

0.68

2

1.02

137.0457

C5H4N4O

Hypoxanthined

1.49

2.04 × 10−6

1.35

0.79(0.67–0.88)

0.68

0.70

3

1.44

269.0880

C10H12N4O5

Inosined

1.72

1.34 × 10−8

1.44

0.86(0.75–0.93)

0.68

0.82

4

4.83

265.1182

C13H16N2O4

Acetyl-N-formyl-5-methoxykynurenamined

1.54

8.81 × 10−7

1.41

0.80(0.69–0.89)

0.82

0.70

5

5.67

304.2112

C15H29NO5

3-hydroxyoctanoyl carnitinec

1.08

9.55 × 10−4

0.73

0.67(0.55–0.78)

0.70

0.65

6

6.63

176.0697

C10H9NO2

Indoleacetic acidd

1.82

1.20 × 10−9

1.34

0.88(0.77–0.94)

0.76

0.80

7

6.91

332.2428

C17H33NO5

3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitinec

1.38

1.39 × 10−5

0.76

0.80(0.69–0.89)

0.76

0.73

8

7.80

466.3159

C26H43NO6

Glycocholic acidd

1.19

2.64 × 10−4

1.39

0.77(0.65–0.86)

0.62

0.70

9

8.09

512.3345

C24H50NO8P

PS(O-18:0/0:0)c

1.69

2.78 × 10−8

1.35

0.88(0.77–0.94)

0.73

0.82

10

8.39

318.3003

C18H39NO3

Phytosphingosined

1.60

2.40 × 10−7

1.40

0.84(0–.73–0.92)

0.76

0.68

11

9.23

302.3052

C18H39NO2

Sphinganined

1.88

1.60 × 10−10

1.38

0.91(0.81–0.96)

0.80

0.76

12

9.85

422.3263

C23H45NO4

linolenyl carnitinec

1.42

8.24 × 10−6

1.38

0.77(0.65–0.86)

0.68

0.76

13

13.44

552.4028

C28H58NO7P

LysoPC(20:0)d

1.39

1.22 × 10−5

1.34

0.76(0.64–0.86)

0.70

0.65

  1. aThe ions were [M + H]+. bThe metabolites marked with “c” were putatively annotated, the metabolites marked with “d” were structurally identified by reference standards, and those in italic type were subjected to variable selection analysis prior to a binary logistic regression analysis. eVariable importance in the projection (VIP) was obtained from the OPLS-DA model. fThe p value was calculated from Student’s t test. gFold change was calculated from the normalized peak area of HG BC group vs LG BC group. hArea under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, with the 95% confidence interval (CI) range in parentheses.