Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Volume 6 Issue 10, October 2022

Exposures and responses to wildfire smoke

Are all communities equally vulnerable to wildfire-smoke exposure? Do government policies that rely on people to limit their own exposure to wildfire smoke work? Burke and colleagues address these questions in the context of Californian wildfires, using data from private pollution sensors, cell phones, social media posts and internet search activity. They find that wealthier households and lower-income households respond differently to smoke events when it comes to seeking health protection information or staying at home. They also find that indoor PM2.5 concentrations are well above health guidelines, with enormous variability among households. These findings suggest that government policies that rely on people’s initiatives alone are broadly ineffective, with unequal benefits for different socioeconomic groups.

See Burke et al.See also News & Views by Hervieux-Moore and Dominici

Cover image: Juan Silva / The Image Bank / Getty. Cover design: Bethany Vukomanovic.

Editorial

  • Advertisement

Top of page ⤴

Comment & Opinion

  • The low representation of academics with disabilities is a longstanding problem on which progress has been slow. Drawing on my research on disability-related barriers and my experiences of disability, I make six practical suggestions for how academic staff and people with disabilities can help make academia more disability inclusive.

    • Jonathan M. Levitt
    Comment
Top of page ⤴

News & Views

  • Why are some communities more vulnerable to wildfire smoke than others? Burke et al. study human behaviour during wildfire events by leveraging multiple non-traditional data sources, including internet search results, Twitter updates, and mobility and sensor data. Their results will help to inform better and more equitable policy.

    • Zachary Hervieux-Moore
    • Francesca Dominici
    News & Views
Top of page ⤴

Research Briefings

  • Proposals to fight online misinformation range from gently encouraging users to consider the accuracy of information (‘nudges’) to bans and removing content. Using modelling techniques, we find that these interventions are unlikely to be effective in isolation, but that a combined approach can achieve a significant reduction in the spread of misinformation.

    Research Briefing
  • A study across 61 countries showed that, on a global scale, individuals are often inconsistent when choosing between immediate and future financial options. Although economic inequality is associated with this decision-making process, nearly everyone demonstrates these anomalies, and instability can lead to worse choices, even in wealthy individuals.

    Research Briefing
Top of page ⤴

Reviews

  • Danilo Bzdok and Robin I. M. Dunbar review the neurobiology of human and primate social behaviours and how the pandemic may have disrupted these systems.

    • Danilo Bzdok
    • Robin I. M. Dunbar
    Review Article
Top of page ⤴

Research

Top of page ⤴

Search

Quick links