Advanced search

Filter By:

Journal Check one or more journals to show results from those journals only.

Choose more journals

Article type Check one or more article types to show results from those article types only.
Subject Check one or more subjects to show results from those subjects only.
Date Choose a date option to show results from those dates only.

Custom date range

Clear all filters
Sort by:
Showing 1–4 of 4 results
Advanced filters: Author: Biljana Macura Clear advanced filters

  • Literature reviews can help to inform decision-making, yet they may be subject to fatal bias if not conducted rigorously as ‘systematic reviews’. Reporting standards help authors to provide sufficient methodological detail to allow verification and replication, clarifying when key steps, such as critical appraisal, have been omitted.

    • Neal Robert Haddaway
    • Biljana Macura
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature Climate Change
    Volume: 8, P: 444-447

  • Systematic reviews are a powerful tool to synthesize large volumes of the published literature, but are susceptible to a number of methodological biases. Here, the authors outline mitigation strategies for improving the quality of evidence syntheses.

    • Neal R. Haddaway
    • Alison Bethel
    • Gavin B. Stewart
    Reviews
    Nature Ecology & Evolution
    Volume: 4, P: 1582-1589