Table 3 Meta-analysis results for ratios of means and mean differences in anthropometric and body composition parameters after 3 months of GLP-1 RA therapy.
Study | GLP-1 RA | SE | −95%CI | +95%CI | p-value | weight [%] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RoM of Body mass | |||||||
Chen et al. [31] | Dulaglutide | 0.96 | 0.02 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.054 | 100.00 |
Gao et al. [54] | Beinaglutide | 0.90 | 0.01 | 0.89 | 0.91 | < 0.001* | 100.00 |
Jensterle et al. [55] | Liraglutide | 0.96 | 0.04 | 0.89 | 1.04 | 0.364 | 23.05 |
Li et al. [58] | 0.94 | 0.03 | 0.88 | 1.01 | 0.107 | 28.65 | |
Munoz et al. [24] | 0.94 | 0.04 | 0.86 | 1.03 | 0.222 | 16.87 | |
Yu et al. [23] | 0.96 | 0.03 | 0.90 | 1.03 | 0.293 | 31.43 | |
0.96 | 0.02 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 0.017* | 100.00 | ||
Volpe et al. [29] | Semaglutide | 0.96 | 0.01 | 0.95 | 0.97 | <0.001* | 49.35 |
Volpe et al. [66] | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.92 | 0.93 | <0.001* | 50.65 | |
0.94 | 0.02 | 0.91 | 0.98 | <0.001* | 100.00 | ||
Summary (random effects) | 0.91 | 0.01 | 0.90 | 0.93 | <0.001* | ||
Intergroup comparison | 0.001* | ||||||
Egger’s test | 0.504 | ||||||
MD of Body mass index [kg/m2] | |||||||
Chen et al. [31] | Dulaglutide | −1.20 | 0.16 | −1.51 | −0.89 | <0.001* | 100.00 |
Gao et al. [54] | Beinaglutide | −3.10 | 0.04 | −3.18 | −3.02 | <0.001* | 100.00 |
Jensterle et al. [55] | Liraglutide | −1.40 | 0.38 | −2.15 | −0.65 | <0.001* | 24.33 |
Li et al. [58] | −1.80 | 0.30 | −2.39 | −1.21 | <0.001* | 27.98 | |
Munoz et al. [24] | −2.99 | 0.55 | −4.06 | −1.92 | <0.001* | 17.90 | |
Yu et al. [23] | −1.15 | 0.26 | −1.66 | −0.64 | <0.001* | 29.80 | |
−1.72 | 0.32 | −2.36 | −1.09 | <0.001* | 100.00 | ||
Uchiyama et al. [65] | Semaglutide | −0.80 | 0.06 | −0.92 | −0.68 | <0.001* | 33.66 |
Volpe et al. [29] | −1.10 | 0.05 | −1.19 | −1.01 | <0.001* | 33.77 | |
Volpe et al. [66] | −3.05 | 0.15 | −3.33 | −2.77 | <0.001* | 32.57 | |
−1.63 | 0.42 | −2.45 | −0.82 | <0.001* | 100.00 | ||
Summary (random effects) | −2.96 | 0.04 | −3.03 | −2.88 | <0.001* | ||
Intergroup comparison | <0.001* | ||||||
Egger’s test | 0.703 | ||||||
MD of Waist circumference [cm] | |||||||
Gao et al. [54] | Beinaglutide | −10.2 | 0.1 | −10.5 | −9.9 | <0.001* | 100.00 |
Jensterle et al. [55] | Liraglutide | −3.4 | 1.0 | −5.4 | −1.4 | <0.001* | 20.41 |
Li et al. [58] | −3.0 | 0.7 | −4.4 | −1.6 | <0.001* | 38.57 | |
Yu et al. [23] | −3.4 | 0.7 | −4.8 | −2.1 | <0.001* | 41.02 | |
−3.3 | 0.5 | −4.2 | −2.4 | <0.001* | 100.00 | ||
Volpe et al. [29] | Semaglutide | −3.1 | 0.1 | −3.3 | −2.9 | <0.001* | 50.16 |
Volpe et al. [66] | −6.3 | 0.2 | −6.7 | −5.9 | <0.001* | 49.84 | |
−4.7 | 1.6 | −7.9 | −1.6 | 0.004* | 100.00 | ||
Summary (random effects) | −9.6 | 0.1 | −9.9 | −9.4 | <0.001* | ||
Intergroup comparison | <0.001* | ||||||
Egger’s test | 0.949 | ||||||
RoM of Fat body mass | |||||||
Chen et al. [31] | Dulaglutide | 0.87 | 0.04 | 0.79 | 0.96 | 0.006* | 100.00 |
Gao et al. [54] | Beinaglutide | 0.83 | 0.01 | 0.81 | 0.84 | <0.001* | 100.00 |
Li et al. [58] | Liraglutide | 0.89 | 0.08 | 0.75 | 1.05 | 0.159 | 17.08 |
Munoz et al. [24] | 0.94 | 0.05 | 0.85 | 1.03 | 0.202 | 51.64 | |
Yu et al. [23] | 0.94 | 0.06 | 0.84 | 1.07 | 0.356 | 31.28 | |
0.93 | 0.03 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.044* | 100.00 | ||
Uchiyama et al. [65] | Semaglutide | 0.95 | 0.02 | 0.92 | 0.98 | <0.001* | 49.50 |
Volpe et al. [29] | 0.84 | 0.01 | 0.83 | 0.86 | <0.001* | 50.50 | |
0.89 | 0.05 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.050 | 100.00 | ||
Summary (random effects) | 0.83 | 0.01 | 0.82 | 0.85 | <0.001* | ||
Intergroup comparison | 0.004* | ||||||
Egger’s test | 0.237 | ||||||
RoM of Lean body mass | |||||||
Chen et al. [31] | Dulaglutide | 0.99 | 0.03 | 0.94 | 1.04 | 0.651 | 100.00 |
Gao et al. [54] | Beinaglutide | 0.97 | 0.01 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.003* | 100.00 |
Li et al. [58] | Liraglutide | 0.97 | 0.04 | 0.90 | 1.05 | 0.475 | 100.00 |
Uchiyama et al. [65] | Semaglutide | 0.99 | 0.01 | 0.97 | 1.01 | 0.463 | 100.00 |
Summary (random effects) | 0.98 | 0.01 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.004* | ||
Intergroup comparison | 0.587 | ||||||
Egger’s test | 0.841 | ||||||
MD of Visceral adipose tissue [cm2] | |||||||
Chen et al. [31] | Dulaglutide | −28.30 | 2.06 | −32.34 | −24.26 | <0.001* | 100.00 |
Gao et al. [54] | Beinaglutide | −29.60 | 0.51 | −30.60 | −28.60 | <0.001* | 100.00 |
Jensterle et al. [55] | Liraglutide | −10.30 | 4.19 | −18.52 | −2.08 | 0.014* | 29.81 |
Munoz et al. [24] | 6.00 | 2.87 | 0.37 | 11.63 | 0.037* | 33.85 | |
Yu et al. [23] | −7.10 | 1.87 | −10.77 | −3.43 | <0.001* | 36.34 | |
−3.62 | 4.83 | −13.09 | 5.85 | 0.454 | 100.00 | ||
Summary (random effects) | −29.25 | 0.49 | −30.22 | −28.28 | <0.001* | ||
Intergroup comparison | <0.001* | ||||||
Egger’s test | 0.104 | ||||||