Table 2 Comparison of prognostic information for MFS

From: The immunologic constant of rejection classification refines the prognostic value of conventional prognostic signatures in breast cancer

Patient group

All

TN

HER2+

HR+/HER2−

N° patients

 

3046

563

352

2131

N° distant Evt

 

631

143

97

391

Clinical model

LR-X²

75.00

---

---

45.45

 

p-Value

3.84E–14

---

---

3.21E–09

ICR classification

LR-X²

10.57

15.38

12.19

1.66

 

p-Value

1.15E–03

8.79E–05

4.81E–04

0.198

70-gene signature

LR-X²

72.09

0.11

1.08

55.09

 

p-Value

 < 2.00E–16

0.735

0.298

1.15E–13

Clinical + 70-gene + ICR4

LR-X²

90.2

15.41

12.66

61.01

 

p-Value

 < 2.00E–16

4.51E–04

1.78E-03

2.81E–11

Clinical  +  70-gene  +  ICR4 vs. Clinical + 70-gene

LR-ΔX²

10.31

15.30

11.57

3.78

 

p-Value

1.33E–03

9.19E–05

6.69E–04

0.052

 Recurrence score (RS)

LR-X²

73.76

0.53

2.35

38.44

 

p-Value

1.11E–16

0.769

0.309

4.49E–09

 Clinical + RS + ICR4

LR-X²

110.90

16.20

15.06

75.67

 

p-Value

 < 2.00E–16

1.03E–03

1.76E–03

1.05E–13

Clinical  +  RS  +  ICR4 vs. Clinical + RS

LR-ΔX²

10.39

15.68

12.72

4.46

 

p-Value

1.27E–03

7.52E–05

3.63E–04

3.46E–02

 Risk of relapse (ROR-P)

LR-X²

103.20

0.65

3.02

77.38

 

p-Value

 < 2.00E–16

0.723

0.221

 < 2.00E–16

 Clinical + ROR-P + ICR4

LR-X²

106.5

16.12

16.11

74.18

 

p-Value

 < 2.00E–16

1.07E–03

1.08E–03

2.10E–13

Clinical  +  ROR-P  +  ICR4 vs. Clinical + ROR-P

LR-ΔX²

12.41

15.47

13.09

5.77

 

p-Value

4.27E–04

8.38E–05

2.97E–04

1.63E–02

* Clinical model variables

 

pT, grade & HR mRNA

none

none

pT & grade

  1. *the clinical variables mentioned correspond to the variables significant in multivariate analysis and integrated in the Clinical model.