Fig. 4: Intermittent MS1262 treatment increases frequency but not amplitude of sEPSCs in DG granule cells of 5xFAD mice without altering intrinsic excitability.

A Quantification of membrane capacity between WT mice and 5xFAD mice treated with vehicle and MS1262 (n = 15/21/22 cells for WT/Vehicle/MS1262) ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test visualized as mean ± SEM. B Quantification of input resistance between WT mice and 5xFAD mice treated with vehicle and MS1262 (n = 15/21/22 cells for WT/Vehicle/MS1262) ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test visualized as mean ± SEM. C Quantification of resting membrane potential between WT mice and 5xFAD mice treated with vehicle and MS1262 (n = 15/21/22 cells for WT/Vehicle/MS1262) ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test visualized as mean ± SEM. D Mean ( ± SEM) number of action potential elicited in response to increasing step current from dentate granule cells of WT mice and 5xFAD mice injected with vehicle (black) or MS1262 (blue). (n = 15/21/22 cells for WT/Vehicle/ MS1262. ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. E Representative traces of sEPSCs recorded from dentate granule cells derived from WT mice and 5xFAD mice injected chronically with vehicle (left) or MS1262 (right). F, G Cumulative probability (f) and average amplitude distribution (g) of sEPSCs (WT, n = 15 cells from 3 mice, 5xFAD-Vehicle, n = 16 cells from 3 mice; 5xFAD-MS1262, n = 15 cells from 3 mice) ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test visualized as mean ± SEM. H, I Cumulative probability distribution (h) and average frequency (i) of sEPSCs (WT, n = 15 cells from 3 mice, 5xFAD-Vehicle, n = 16 cells from 3 mice; 5xFAD-MS1262, n = 15 cells from 3 mice. P = 0.0004, Kruskal-Wallis test, Dunn’s test for multiple comparisons p < 0.0001 and p = .0453) visualized as mean ± SEM. J, K fEPSP slope (J) as measured as a percent of baseline and LTP visualized in a bar graph (k). (WT, n = 8 slices from 3 mice, 5xFAD-vehicle, n = 4 slices from 3 mice; 5xFAD-MS1262, n = 9 slices from 4 mice. ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001 Data are visualized as mean ± SEM. (See also Data S3).