Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Vaccines
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj vaccines
  3. articles
  4. article
Development of in vitro airway epithelial model to assess immune response and safety of mucosal adjuvants
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 22 April 2026

Development of in vitro airway epithelial model to assess immune response and safety of mucosal adjuvants

  • David Acosta1,
  • Mohammad Rubel Hoq1,
  • Kazuyo Takeda2,
  • Chad D. Costley3,
  • Hana Golding1 &
  • …
  • Marina Zaitseva1 

npj Vaccines (2026) Cite this article

  • 1677 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Diseases
  • Drug discovery
  • Immunology
  • Microbiology

Abstract

Mucosal vaccines delivered intranasally or by inhalation, can elicit localized immunity that protects mucosal tissues at the site of infection and may reduce transmission of respiratory viruses, including respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza virus, and SARS-CoV-2. Many mucosal vaccine candidates incorporate adjuvants to enhance and broaden immune response, underscoring the need for safe and effective formulations targeting the respiratory mucosa. Here, we employed differentiated human nasal and bronchial epithelial cells (hNEC and hBEC) cultured at air-liquid interface (ALI) to evaluate the soybean oil-in-water intranasal NE01 adjuvant, recently assessed clinically. Kinetic and dose-response studies showed that hBECs were more sensitive than hNEC to the cytopathic effect of NE01 as evidenced by loss of barrier integrity, reduced viability, and Interleukin-8 production. Spiking Cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), a component of NE01, into a squalene oil-in-water adjuvant identified CPC as a potential contributor to the observed cytotoxicity in hBEC. Lower NE01 concentrations did not compromise hBEC viability or barrier function, indicating concentration-dependent effects and establishing thresholds for epithelial perturbation. The data provide proof-of-concept supporting the ALI system for assessing the effects of mucosal adjuvants on Upper and Lower respiratory tract epithelia during the early stages of development. This approach may help prioritize candidates while reducing reliance on animal use in preclinical evaluation.

Similar content being viewed by others

Mucosal adenovirus vaccine boosting elicits IgA and durably prevents XBB.1.16 infection in nonhuman primates

Article Open access 03 September 2024

Enhancing the protection of influenza virus vaccines with BECC TLR4 adjuvant in aged mice

Article Open access 13 January 2023

Mitigation of acute lung injury by human bronchial epithelial cell-derived extracellular vesicles via ANXA1-mediated FPR signaling

Article Open access 06 May 2024

Data availability

Data were provided within the manuscript or supplementary information files.

References

  1. Zhang, Z. et al. Mucosal immunity and vaccination strategies: current insights and future perspectives. Mol. Biomed. 6, 57 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jung, J. et al. Transmission and infectious SARS-CoV-2 shedding kinetics in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. JAMA Netw. Open 5, e2213606 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Puhach, O. et al. Infectious viral load in unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals infected with ancestral, Delta or Omicron SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Med. 28, 1491–1500 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Singanayagam, A. et al. Community transmission and viral load kinetics of the SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) variant in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in the UK: a prospective, longitudinal, cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 22, 183–195 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lavelle, E. C. & Ward, R. W. Mucosal vaccines - fortifying the frontiers. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 22, 236–250 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Macpherson, A. J., McCoy, K. D., Johansen, F. E. & Brandtzaeg, P. The immune geography of IgA induction and function. Mucosal Immunol. 1, 11–22 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sinha, D., Yaugel-Novoa, M., Waeckel, L., Paul, S. & Longet, S. Unmasking the potential of secretory IgA and its pivotal role in protection from respiratory viruses. Antivir. Res. 223, 105823 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mao, T. et al. Unadjuvanted intranasal spike vaccine elicits protective mucosal immunity against sarbecoviruses. Science 378, eabo2523 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boyaka, P. N. Inducing mucosal IgA: A challenge for vaccine adjuvants and delivery systems. J. Immunol. 199, 9–16 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li, J. et al. Advances and prospects of respiratory mucosal vaccines: mechanisms, technologies, and clinical applications. NPJ Vaccines 10, 230 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zeng, L. Mucosal adjuvants: opportunities and challenges. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 12, 2456–2458 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maciel, M. Jr. et al. Evaluation of the reactogenicity, adjuvanticity and antigenicity of LT(R192G) and LT(R192G/L211A) by intradermal immunization in mice. PLoS ONE 14, e0224073 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Seok, J. et al. Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3507–3512 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zeiss, C. J. & Brayton, C. F. Immune responses to the real world. Lab Anim. 47, 13–14 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grainger, C. I., Greenwell, L. L., Lockley, D. J., Martin, G. P. & Forbes, B. Culture of Calu-3 cells at the air interface provides a representative model of the airway epithelial barrier. Pharm. Res. 23, 1482–1490 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Silva, S., Bicker, J., Falcão, A. & Fortuna, A. Air-liquid interface (ALI) impact on different respiratory cell cultures. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 184, 62–82 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kesimer, M. et al. Tracheobronchial air-liquid interface cell culture: a model for innate mucosal defense of the upper airways?. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 296, L92–L100 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Prytherch, Z. et al. Tissue-specific stem cell differentiation in an in vitro airway model. Macromol. Biosci. 11, 1467–1477 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fulcher, M. L. & Randell, S. H. Human nasal and tracheo-bronchial respiratory epithelial cell culture. Methods Mol. Biol. 945, 109–121 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rayner, R. E., Makena, P., Prasad, G. L. & Cormet-Boyaka, E. Optimization of normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cell 3D cultures for in vitro lung model studies. Sci. Rep. 9, 500 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao, C. et al. Activation of STAT3-mediated ciliated cell survival protects against severe infection by respiratory syncytial virus. J. Clin. Invest. 134, e183978 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hou, Y. J. et al. SARS-CoV-2 reverse genetics reveals a variable infection gradient in the respiratory tract. Cell 182, 429–446 e414 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liang, K. et al. Initiator cell death event induced by SARS-CoV-2 in the human airway epithelium. Sci. Immunol. 9, eadn0178 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stolting, H. et al. Distinct airway epithelial immune responses after infection with SARS-CoV-2 compared to H1N1. Mucosal Immunol. 15, 952–963 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Major, J. et al. Type I and III interferons disrupt lung epithelial repair during recovery from viral infection. Science 369, 712–717 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Song, B. M., Kang, Y. M., Kim, H. S. & Seo, S. H. Induction of inflammatory cytokines and toll-like receptors in human normal respiratory epithelial cells infected with seasonal H1N1, 2009 pandemic H1N1, seasonal H3N2, and highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus. Viral Immunol. 24, 179–187 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Forero, A. et al. Evaluation of the innate immune responses to influenza and live-attenuated influenza vaccine infection in primary differentiated human nasal epithelial cells. Vaccine 35, 6112–6121 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Makidon, P. E. et al. Pre-clinical evaluation of a novel nanoemulsion-based hepatitis B mucosal vaccine. PLoS ONE 3, e2954 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hamouda, T., Sutcliffe, J. A., Ciotti, S. & Baker, J. R. Jr. Intranasal immunization of ferrets with commercial trivalent influenza vaccines formulated in a nanoemulsion-based adjuvant. Clin. Vaccin. Immunol. 18, 1167–1175 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stanberry, L. R. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a novel nanoemulsion mucosal adjuvant W805EC combined with approved seasonal influenza antigens. Vaccine 30, 307–316 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Das, S. C. et al. Nanoemulsion W805EC improves immune responses upon intranasal delivery of an inactivated pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccine. Vaccine 30, 6871–6877 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, S. H. et al. Recombinant H5 hemagglutinin adjuvanted with nanoemulsion protects ferrets against pathogenic avian influenza virus challenge. Vaccine 37, 1591–1600 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Smith, D., Streatfield, S. J., Acosta, H., Ganesan, S. & Fattom, A. A nanoemulsion-adjuvanted intranasal H5N1 influenza vaccine protects ferrets against homologous and heterologous H5N1 lethal challenge. Vaccine 37, 6162–6170 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Deming, M. E. et al. An intranasal adjuvanted, recombinant influenza A/H5 vaccine primes against diverse H5N1 clades: a phase I trial. Nat. Commun. 16, 9321 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Roy, C. J. et al. Aerosolized adenovirus-vectored vaccine as an alternative vaccine delivery method. Respir. Res. 12, 153 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Xu, H., Cai, L., Hufnagel, S. & Cui, Z. Intranasal vaccine: factors to consider in research and development. Int. J. Pharm. 609, 121180 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jeyanathan, M. et al. Induction of lung mucosal immunity by a next-generation inhaled aerosol COVID-19 vaccine: an open-label, multi-arm phase 1 clinical trial. Nat. Commun. 16, 6000 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Huvenne, W. et al. Different regulation of cigarette smoke induced inflammation in upper versus lower airways. Respir. Res. 11, 100 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sahakijpijarn, S., Smyth, H. D. C., Miller, D. P. & Weers, J. G. Post-inhalation cough with therapeutic aerosols: formulation considerations. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 165-166, 127–141 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Haschek, W. M., Witschi, H. R. & Nikula, K. J. in Handbook of Toxicologic Pathology (Second Edition) (eds Haschek, W. M., Rousseaux, C. G. & Wallig, M. A.) (Academic Press, 2002).

  41. Liu, Y., Johnson, M. R., Matida, E. A., Kherani, S. & Marsan, J. Creation of a standardized geometry of the human nasal cavity. J. Appl. Physiol. 106, 784–795 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Marshall, L. J., Perks, B., Ferkol, T. & Shute, J. K. IL-8 released constitutively by primary bronchial epithelial cells in culture forms an inactive complex with secretory component. J. Immunol. 167, 2816–2823 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Atkinson, J. J. & Senior, R. M. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 in lung remodeling. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 28, 12–24 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wolosowicz, M., Prokopiuk, S. & Kaminski, T. W. Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) as a therapeutic target: insights into molecular pathways and clinical applications. Pharmaceutics 17, 1425 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rodenburg, L. W. et al. Exploring intrinsic variability between cultured nasal and bronchial epithelia in cystic fibrosis. Sci. Rep. 13, 18573 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Horowitz, A., Chanez-Paredes, S. D., Haest, X. & Turner, J. R. Paracellular permeability and tight junction regulation in gut health and disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 20, 417–432 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Otani, T. & Furuse, M. Tight junction structure and function revisited. Trends Cell Biol. 30, 1014 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gonzalez-Mariscal, L., Betanzos, A., Nava, P. & Jaramillo, B. E. Tight junction proteins. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 81, 1–44 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Fanning, A. S. & Anderson, J. M. Zonula occludens-1 and -2 are cytosolic scaffolds that regulate the assembly of cellular junctions. Ann. N. Y Acad. Sci. 1165, 113–120 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Umeda, K. et al. ZO-1 and ZO-2 independently determine where claudins are polymerized in tight-junction strand formation. Cell 126, 741–754 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Vermeer, P. D. et al. MMP9 modulates tight junction integrity and cell viability in human airway epithelia. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 296, L751–L762 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Myc, A. et al. Nanoemulsion nasal adjuvant W(8)(0)5EC induces dendritic cell engulfment of antigen-primed epithelial cells. Vaccine 31, 1072–1079 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Bielinska, A. U. et al. Mucosal immunization with a novel nanoemulsion-based recombinant anthrax protective antigen vaccine protects against Bacillus anthracis spore challenge. Infect. Immun. 75, 4020–4029 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Bielinska, A. U. et al. Nasal immunization with a recombinant HIV gp120 and nanoemulsion adjuvant produces Th1 polarized responses and neutralizing antibodies to primary HIV type 1 isolates. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 24, 271–281 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Bielinska, A. U. et al. Distinct pathways of humoral and cellular immunity induced with the mucosal administration of a nanoemulsion adjuvant. J. Immunol. 192, 2722–2733 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Mao, X. et al. Cetylpyridinium chloride: mechanism of action, antimicrobial efficacy in biofilms, and potential risks of resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 64, 10–1128 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wong, P. T. et al. Formulation and characterization of nanoemulsion intranasal adjuvants: effects of surfactant composition on mucoadhesion and immunogenicity. Mol. Pharm. 11, 531–544 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Illum, L. Nasal drug delivery–possibilities, problems and solutions. J. Control Release 87, 187–198 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Kanno, S. et al. Benzalkonium chloride and cetylpyridinium chloride induce apoptosis in human lung epithelial cells and alter surface activity of pulmonary surfactant monolayers. Chem. Biol. Interact. 317, 108962 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Yegin, Y., Oh, J. K., Akbulut, M. & Taylor, T. Cetylpyridinium chloride produces increased zeta-potential on Salmonella Typhimurium cells, a mechanism of the pathogen’s inactivation. npj Sci. Food 3, 21 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sharma, V. et al. Protein-surfactant interactions: a multitechnique approach on the effect of co-solvents over bovine serum albumin (BSA)-cetyl pyridinium chloride (CPC) system. Chem. Phys. Lett. 747, 137349 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Bernstein, I. L. Is the use of benzalkonium chloride as a preservative for nasal formulations a safety concern? A cautionary note based on compromised mucociliary transport. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 105, 39–44 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Larsen, S. T., Verder, H. & Nielsen, G. D. Airway effects of inhaled quaternary ammonium compounds in mice. Basic Clin. Pharm. Toxicol. 110, 537–543 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Kwon, D. et al. Evaluation of pulmonary toxicity of benzalkonium chloride and triethylene glycol mixtures using in vitro and in vivo systems. Environ. Toxicol. 34, 561–572 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  65. George, M., Joshi, S. V., Concepcion, E. & Lee, H. Paradoxical bronchospasm from benzalkonium chloride (BAC) preservative in albuterol nebulizer solution in a patient with acute severe asthma. A case report and literature review of airway effects of BAC. Respir. Med. Case Rep. 21, 39–41 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Herriges, M. & Morrisey, E. E. Lung development: orchestrating the generation and regeneration of a complex organ. Development 141, 502–513 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Widdicombe, J. H. Early studies on the surface epithelium of mammalian airways. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 317, L486–L495 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Parker, D. & Prince, A. Innate immunity in the respiratory epithelium. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 45, 189–201 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Ioannidis, I., Ye, F., McNally, B., Willette, M. & Flano, E. Toll-like receptor expression and induction of type I and type III interferons in primary airway epithelial cells. J. Virol. 87, 3261–3270 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Golebski, K. et al. FcgammaRIII stimulation breaks the tolerance of human nasal epithelial cells to bacteria through cross-talk with TLR4. Mucosal Immunol. 12, 425–433 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Unger, W. W. et al. Nasal tolerance induces antigen-specific CD4+CD25- regulatory T cells that can transfer their regulatory capacity to naive CD4+ T cells. Int. Immunol. 15, 731–739 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Imkamp, K. et al. Gene network approach reveals co-expression patterns in nasal and bronchial epithelium. Sci. Rep. 9, 15835 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Vieira Braga, F. A. et al. A cellular census of human lungs identifies novel cell states in health and in asthma. Nat. Med. 25, 1153–1163 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Shinya, K. et al. Avian flu: influenza virus receptors in the human airway. Nature 440, 435–436 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Alves, M. P. et al. Comparison of innate immune responses towards rhinovirus infection of primary nasal and bronchial epithelial cells. Respirology 21, 304–312 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Frohlich, E. Better GRAS than sorry: excipient toxicity in pulmonary formulations. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 215, 114814 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Cao, X., Muskhelishvili, L., Latendresse, J., Richter, P. & Heflich, R. H. Evaluating the toxicity of cigarette whole smoke solutions in an air-liquid-interface human in vitro airway tissue model. Toxicol. Sci. 156, 14–24 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Fulcher, M. L., Gabriel, S., Burns, K. A., Yankaskas, J. R. & Randell, S. H. Well-differentiated human airway epithelial cell cultures. Methods Mol. Med. 107, 183–206 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Gentzsch, M. et al. Pharmacological rescue of conditionally reprogrammed cystic fibrosis bronchial epithelial cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 56, 568–574 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. Carol Weiss and Keith Peden for comments on the manuscript and valuable discussions. This research was supported by intramural funding from the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Viral Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA

    David Acosta, Mohammad Rubel Hoq, Hana Golding & Marina Zaitseva

  2. Microscopy and Imaging Core Facility, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA

    Kazuyo Takeda

  3. BlueWillow Biologics, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Chad D. Costley

Authors
  1. David Acosta
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammad Rubel Hoq
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kazuyo Takeda
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chad D. Costley
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hana Golding
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marina Zaitseva
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.A. and M.R.H.: Investigation; K.T.: Investigation and data analysis; C.D.C.: NE01, Writing—review and editing; HG: Writing—review and editing; M.Z.: Conceptualization and data analysis, Writing—original draft and editing. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina Zaitseva.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Acosta, D., Rubel Hoq, M., Takeda, K. et al. Development of in vitro airway epithelial model to assess immune response and safety of mucosal adjuvants. npj Vaccines (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-026-01459-z

Download citation

  • Received: 25 September 2025

  • Accepted: 10 April 2026

  • Published: 22 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-026-01459-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Open Access
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial policies
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Vaccines (npj Vaccines)

ISSN 2059-0105 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research