Reproducibility and replicability are fundamental requirements of scientific studies. Disagreements over universal definitions for these terms have affected the interpretation of large-scale replication attempts. We provide a visual tool for representing definitions and use it to re-examine these attempts.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Statistical Perspectives on Reproducibility: Definitions and Challenges
Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice Open Access 27 May 2025
-
ENCORE: a practical implementation to improve reproducibility and transparency of computational research
Nature Communications Open Access 16 September 2024
-
Orchestrating and sharing large multimodal data for transparent and reproducible research
Nature Communications Open Access 04 October 2021
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Data and code availability
The scifigure package and its accompanying vignette can be downloaded from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=scifigure
Change history
29 July 2019
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
References
Fanelli, D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2628–2631 (2018).
Kenett, R. S. & Shmueli, G. Nat. Methods 12, 699 (2015).
Open Science Collaboration. Science 349, aac4716 (2015).
Peng, R. D. Science 334, 1226–1227 (2011).
Gilbert, D. T., King, G., Pettigrew, S. & Wilson, T. D. Science 351, 1037 (2016).
Heller, R., Bogomolov, M. & Benjamini, Y. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16262–16267 (2014).
Begley, C. G. & Ellis, L. M. Nature 483, 531–533 (2012).
Cramer, P. E. et al. Science 335, 1503–1506 (2012).
Klein, R. A. et al. Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 1, 443–490 (2018).
Baggerly, K. A. & Coombes, K. R. Ann. Appl. Stat. 3, 1309–1334 (2009).
Johnson, R. A. Statistics: Principles and Methods (Wiley, 2009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Supplementary material
Supplementary Information (download PDF )
Supplementary Information.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patil, P., Peng, R.D. & Leek, J.T. A visual tool for defining reproducibility and replicability. Nat Hum Behav 3, 650–652 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0629-z
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0629-z
This article is cited by
-
Statistical Perspectives on Reproducibility: Definitions and Challenges
Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice (2025)
-
ENCORE: a practical implementation to improve reproducibility and transparency of computational research
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Abnormal global-brain functional connectivity and its relationship with cognitive deficits in drug-naive first-episode adolescent-onset schizophrenia
Brain Imaging and Behavior (2022)
-
Provenance matters
Nature Geoscience (2021)
-
Orchestrating and sharing large multimodal data for transparent and reproducible research
Nature Communications (2021)