Extended Data Fig. 10: Comparison of sample preparation methods. | Nature

Extended Data Fig. 10: Comparison of sample preparation methods.

From: Clinical-grade autonomous cytopathology through whole-slide edge tomography

Extended Data Fig. 10: Comparison of sample preparation methods.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

a, Age distributions for the SurePath and ThinPrep cohorts in the Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR (median line, IQR; whiskers = 1.5×IQR; outliers omitted). Medians [IQR; n]: SurePath (n = 265) 50.0 [42.0–60.0], ThinPrep (n = 53) 45.0 [37.0–50.0]. b, c, ROC curves for detecting LSIL+ (LSIL, ASC-H, HSIL, SCC) and HSIL+ (HSIL, SCC) at the Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR (C), stratified by liquid-based cytology sample preparation: SurePath (b, n = 265) and ThinPrep (c, n = 53). ROC curves use AI-derived cell counts as predictors; AUC values are shown in the legends for each endpoint.

Back to article page