Table 1 Statistical analyses.
From: Individual-specific strategies inform category learning
Comparison | Figure | N | Mean | Stand. dev. | Test | Statistic | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Initial bias significance | 1D | 19 mice | -0.032 | 0.303 | One-sample Student’s t-test | \(-0.253\) | 0.803 |
Accuracy of control vs. muscimol | 1F | 20 session pairs, 6 mice | Control: 0.92, musc: 0.80 | Control: 0.04, musc: 0.12 | Wilcoxon sign-rank test | 11.0 | 2e−04 |
Choice bias drift vs. psychometric threshold variability | 2C | 18 mice | Training drift: 0.13, thresh. var: 0.03 | Training drift: 0.09, thresh. var: 0.02 | Spearman’s rho | 0.67 | 2e−03 |
Choice bias drift vs. psychometric slope variability | 2D | 18 mice | Training drift: 0.13, slope. var: 0.07 | Training drift: 0.09, slope. var: 0.03 | Spearman’s rho | 0.437 | 0.08 |
Choice bias drift vs. psychometric guess rate variability | 2E | 18 mice | Training drift: 0.13, GR. var: 0.12 | Training drift: 0.09, GR. var: 0.05 | Spearman’s rho | 0.057 | 0.823 |
Choice bias drift vs. psychometric lapse rate variability | 2F | 18 mice | Training drift: 0.13, LR. var: 0.05 | Training drift: 0.09, LR. var: 0.03 | Spearman’s rho | 0.143 | 0.57 |
Drifting slope vs stationary | 3B | Drifting: 8 mice, stationary: 9 mice | Drifting: −1.8e−03, stationary: −3.5e−04 | Drifting: 1.2e−03, stationary: 1.1e−03 | One-sided Mann-Whitney U-test | 71.0 | 0.013 |
Drifting BIC comparison vs stationary | 4B | Drifting: 8 mice, stationary: 9 mice | N/A | N/A | Proportions Z-test | 2.8 | 4e−03 |
Beta term vs history-dependent choice probability | 4D | 19 mice | Beta term: 0.55, HD: 0.49 | Beta term: 0.38, HD: 0.02 | Spearman’s rho | \(-0.67\) | 2e−03 |
Beta term vs lose-switch probability | 4E | 19 mice | Beta term: 0.55, LS: 0.48 | Beta term: 0.38, LS: 0.06 | Spearman’s rho | \(-0.7\) | 1e−03 |
Beta term vs win-stay probability | 4F | 19 mice | Beta term: 0.55, WS: 0.50 | Beta term: 0.38, WS: 0.02 | Spearman’s rho | \(-0.07\) | 0.78 |
Lose-switch early vs late | 4G | 19 mice | Early: 0.41, late: 0.61 | Early: 0.08, late: 0.09 | Wilcoxon sign-rank test | 1.0 | 7.6e−06 |
Win-stay early vs late | 4H | 19 mice | Early: 0.51, late: 0.48 | Early: 0.04, late: 0.03 | Wilcoxon sign-rank test | 35.0 | 0.014 |
Lose-switch probability vs session number | 4I | 19 mice | LSP: 0.51, sess: 13.4 | LSP: 0.13, sess: 8.6 | OLS model | 13.6 | 4e−35 |
Win-stay probability vs session number | 4J | 19 mice | WSP: 0.50, sess: 13.4 | WSP: 0.051, sess: 8.6 | OLS model | \(-6.0\) | 5.2e−09 |
