Table 7 Comparison with state-of-the-art chipless RFID + ML technologies.

From: Edge machine learning over IoT for chipless RFID environmental sensing in smart agriculture

References

Tag/Platform (Capacity)

Sensing type

Sensor sensitivity/metric (quantitative)

Dataset/Handling

ML models used

Key results

Edge/Serverless ML

Notes

17

Chipless EM crack sensor

Crack width

128 MHz/mm & 114 MHz/mm (two resonances)

Measured (wireless sensing)

High crack-width sensitivity

Passive structural-health sensing (no ID/edge focus)

22

Chipless RFID humidity sensing (reviewed designs)

Humidity

Reports examples up to Δf = 270 MHz for 35–85%RH (example cited in the paper; ≈ 5.4 MHz/%RH if linear)

Literature survey

Quantitative RH shift examples

Use as passive humidity-sensing benchmark (table now includes quantitative metric)

25

Wireless chipless EM multiplexed temperature sensor

Temperature

Sensitivity ≈ 0.55%·°C⁻1

Experimental (reported)

Passive temperature sensing

Non-RFID chipless EM temperature sensor benchmark

34

Passive soil-moisture sensing + edge processing

Soil moisture

90th-percentile error ≈ 5%

Field/edge inference workflow

Regression / edge ML

Accuracy reported at edge

Edge

Included as capacitive/soil-moisture passive sensing benchmark

37

3-bit circular-ring + 3 states

Capacitance

Sensing error reported (e.g., 0.0241 / 3.44%)

9,600 robot-collected traces

SVR, RF, GBT, 1-D CNN

CNN best overall

Strong dataset realism; single-parameter sensing

40

5-bit octagonal FSS (4 codes)

None

4,480 measured; varied orientation

SVM, k-NN, LR, DT

≈99.3% ID

Identification only; no sensing

51

Humidity-sensitive material model (Kapton)

Humidity

εr = 3.05 + 0.008 × RH% (dielectric–RH slope)

Model-based (reported)

Material sensitivity used in RH sensing

Included as passive-material benchmark (quantitative slope)

54

CRR/SRR arrays (4–16 tags)

None

Measured RCS + PCA features

LR, SVM

100% ID (4 tags @ 160 cm)

Identification only; no sensing

55

8-bit ring + 6 states

Capacitance

GBT = 0.032 pF (sensing)

1,530 simulated; RFECV

SVR, GBT, RF, DT

Simulation-based pipeline

Single-parameter sensing; no experiments

56

Dipole, coupling-aware (> 17 bits)

None

Combined sim/exp; ML resonance forecast

Regression trees

97.6% within 25 MHz

Partial

Encoding-density optimization; no sensing

This Work

12-resonator sensing variant

Dual (Temp + RH)

Temp notch shift rate ≈ 1.75 MHz/°C (Taconic RF-35); RH shift ≈ 200 MHz over 0–90%RH 2.22 MHz/%RH

Hybrid (sim + measured RCS); domain augmentation

RF, SVR, XGBoost, k-Means

 ± 1.3 °C / ± 2.1%RH; 96.2% bin acc.; 98% AUC

Full

Unified ID + dual sensing + edge/cloud integration