Table 3 Results of benchmark regression.

From: Can household inclusive finance alleviate the relative poverty of rural residents? Evidence from static and dynamic perspectives

Variables

S_poverty

D_poverty

(1) coefficients

(2) marginal effects

(3) coefficients

(4) marginal effects

\(H{IFI}\)

–0.0280***

–0.0080***

–0.0654***

–0.0114***

(0.0011)

(0.0003)

(0.0016)

(0.0003)

\({head\_age}\)

–0.0012

–0.0003

0.0269***

0.0047***

(0.0009)

(0.0003)

(0.0013)

(0.0002)

\({head\_gen}\)

0.0941***

0.0267***

0.2811***

0.0488***

(0.0210)

(0.0060)

(0.0271)

(0.0047)

\({head\_mar}\)

–0.0674

–0.0191

0.1354**

0.0235**

(0.0479)

(0.0136)

(0.0634)

(0.0110)

\({head\_edu}\)

–0.1214***

–0.0345***

–0.5322***

–0.0924***

(0.0085)

(0.0024)

(0.0130)

(0.0021)

\({head\_hea}\)

–0.1048***

–0.0298***

–0.4134***

–0.0718***

(0.0074)

(0.0021)

(0.0096)

(0.0015)

\({house\_siz}\)

–0.0895***

–0.0254***

–0.1397***

–0.0243***

(0.0073)

(0.0021)

(0.0100)

(0.0017)

\({lnhouse\_deb}\)

0.0649***

0.0184***

–0.1569***

–0.0272***

(0.0079)

(0.0022)

(0.0122)

(0.0021)

\({house\_dep}\)

0.0040***

0.0011***

0.0007**

0.0001**

(0.0003)

(0.0001)

(0.0004)

(0.0001)

\(\mathrm{ln}p{gdp}\)

–0.6380**

–0.1812**

–1.9934***

–0.3462***

(0.2917)

(0.0829)

(0.3562)

(0.0618)

\(f{in}\)

–0.0053**

–0.0015**

–0.0060**

–0.0010**

(0.0023)

(0.0007)

(0.0030)

(0.0005)

\(l{iv}\)

–0.0430***

–0.0122***

–0.0461***

–0.0080***

(0.0137)

(0.0039)

(0.0170)

(0.0029)

Time FE

Y

Y

Y

Y

Province FE

Y

Y

Y

Y

Pseudo R2

0.1135

0.1135

0.4336

0.4336

N

38,322

38,322

38,322

38,322

  1. Notes: Robust standard errors are in parentheses. **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01.
Back to article page