Table 1 Performance of binomial generalised linear models predicting the probability of occurrence of flood anomalies in each region using portions of flood generation processes and different precipitation indices as explanatory variables.
From: Shifts in flood generation processes exacerbate regional flood anomalies in Europe
NORTH (n = 124)e | ATL (n = 477) | MED (n = 182) | CENTR (n = 570) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FP | FR | FP | FR | FP | FR | FP | FR | |
7-days precipitation max | ||||||||
Likelihood ratio testa | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p = 0.18 |
Pseudo R2 (McFadden)b | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.02 |
Pseudo R2 (Lave/Efron)c | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.32 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.04 |
AICbaseline-AICfulld | 29.54 | 11.65 | 60.52 | 68.43 | 19.39 | 14.75 | 57.05 | −1.15 |
1-day precipitation max | ||||||||
Likelihood ratio test | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p = 0.40 |
Pseudo R2 (McFadden) | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
Pseudo R2 (Lave/Efron) | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.27 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.05 |
AICbaseline-AICfull | 29.54 | 11.65 | 68.19 | 54.97 | 22.10 | 17.23 | 12.65 | 0.03 |