Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Scientific Correspondence
  • Published:

A Roman “implant” reconsidered

Abstract

A supposed “wrought iron” dental implant1 was recently reported from a second century CE Gallo-Roman necropolis in Chantambre (Essonne, France), but in my view the data need to be re-evaluated in the light of what is known regarding ancient and modern dentistry2,4. The item is described as “severely corroded”, for example, but an X-ray reveals a perfectly formed tooth with a smooth, intact surface free from the pitting expected on a small iron object interred for nearly 2,000 years under less than ideal conditions. The archaeological context and data on finds of iron in this and other tombs are not provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Crubézy, E., Pascal Murail, L. G. & Bernadou, J.-P. Nature 391, 29 (1998).

  2. Becker, M.J. in Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Anthropology and History of Health and Disease Vol. 2 (ed. Guerci, A.) 8-19 (Erga, Genova, 1998).

  3. Albrektsson, T., Zarb, G. A., Worthington, P. & Eriksson, A. R.. Int. J. Oral Maxillofacial Implants 1, 11-25 (1986).

  4. Becker, M. J. Dental Anthropol. Newsl. 9, 5-10 (1994).

  5. Becker, M. J. J. Paleopathol. 6, 69-92 (1994).

  6. Becker, M. J. in Actas del I Congreso Internacional de Estudios sobre Momias, 1992 (ed. Aufderheide, A. C.) Vol. 2, 651-658 (Museo Arqueologico y Etnologico de Tenerife, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, 1995).

  7. Becker, M. J. Berytus 42, 71-102 (1995/6).

  8. Schnitman, P. A. & Schulman, L. B. (eds) Dental Implants. Benefits and Risk. (U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services, Washington, 1979).

  9. Braonemark, P.-I. et al. 16 (1977).

  10. Henry, P. J. et al. 11, 450-455 (1996).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Becker, M. A Roman “implant” reconsidered. Nature 394, 534 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/28980

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/28980

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing