Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Animal behaviour

Benefits of female mimicry in snakes

She-male garter snakes exploit the amorous attentions of other males to warm up.

Abstract

Males of several animal species mimic females either in appearance or in the chemical cues they release1,2, and this mimicry has generally been interpreted in terms of alternative mating strategies –– for example, a male that mimics a female may obtain stolen inseminations or avoid aggression from larger rivals3. Our studies of snakes suggest a different explanation, which relies on natural selection rather than sexual selection. Male garter snakes that produce female-like pheromones (she-males) may benefit simply because large 'mating balls' of amorous males form around them, transferring heat to the she-male after it emerges from hibernation and reducing its exposure to predators.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: A newly emerged female-mimicking (she-male) garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis), still covered in white limestone dust from its underground hibernation den, is enthusiastically courted by five other adult male snakes.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersson, M. Sexual Selection (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1994).

  2. Mason, R. T. & Crews, D. Nature 316, 59–60 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Trivers, R. L. Evolution 30, 253–269 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shine, R., Harlow, P. S., LeMaster, M. P., Moore, I. & Mason, R. T. Anim. Behav. 59, 349–359 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shine, R., O'Connor, D. & Mason, R. T. Can. J. Zool. 78, 1391–1396 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shine, R., LeMaster, M. P., Moore, I. T., Olsson, M. M. & Mason, R. T. Evolution 55, 598–604 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Olson, D. H. Copeia 1989, 391–397 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamilton, W. D. J. Theor. Biol. 31, 295–311 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Whittier, J. M., Mason, R. T. & Crews, D. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 16, 257–261 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shine, R., Harlow, P. S., Elphick, M. J., Olsson, M. M. & Mason, R. T. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 73, 508–516 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Heckrotte, C. Copeia 1967, 759–763 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Shine.

Additional information

Competing financial interests: declared none.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shine, R., Phillips, B., Waye, H. et al. Benefits of female mimicry in snakes. Nature 414, 267 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35104687

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35104687

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing