Abstract
There are several explanations for the evolution of human longevity and senescence1,2, a recent example being the suggestion by Perls et al.3 of a relationship between longevity in women and the age at which they bore children. Perls et al. showed that women surviving to at least age 100 were four times more likely to have had children while in their 40s than women who survived to age 73. But it is not possible to argue from these data that “the driving selective force of human lifespan is maximizing the period of time during which women can bear children” without a comparison of the total number of offspring produced (lifetime repro- duction, LR) of the two groups of women.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
1.Neese, R. M. & Williams, G. C. Evolution and Healing (Weinfelden & Nicholson, London, 1995).
2.Stearns, S. C. The Evolution of Life Histories (Oxford Univ. Press, 1992).
Perls, T. T., Alpert, L. & Fretts, R. C. Nature 389, 133(1997).
4.Daan, S. & Tinbergen, J. M. in Behavioural Ecology4th edn (eds Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B.) 311-333 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1997).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heeb, P., Brinkhof, M. Mixed blessings for middle-aged mothers. Nature 389, 922 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/40044
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/40044
