Abstract
Movshovich et al. suggest that our calorimetric observation of the FFLO superconducting phase boundary1 and its angular dependence are inconsistent with their own data reporting the possible presence of an FFLO phase, and that we have incorrectly used magnetothermal measurements to identify the order of the FFLO transition. They also contest that the correlation of the magnetization steps with the calorimetrically identified FFLO superconducting phase of CeCoIn5 is coincidental. We consider each of these points in turn.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Radovan, H. et al. Nature 425, 51–55 (2003).
Bianchi, A. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 187004 (2003).
Bianchi, A. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 137002 (2002).
Aoki, H. et al. J. Phys. Cond. Mat. 16, L13–L19 (2004).
Ikeda, S. et al. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 70, 2248–2251 (2001).
Tayama, T. et al. Phys. Rev. B. 65, 180504 (2002).
Won, H. et al. Preprint at 〈http://xxx.lanl.gov/cond-mat/0306548〉 (2003).
Klein, U. Preprint at 〈http://xxx.lanl.gov/cond-mat/0312095〉 (2003).
Klein, U., Rainer, D. & Shimahara, H. J. Low Temp. Phys. 118, 91–104 (2002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Radovan, H., Fortune, N., Murphy, T. et al. Magnetic enhancement of superconductivity. Nature 427, 802 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/427802b
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/427802b
This article is cited by
-
Vortex lattices in type-II superconductors studied by small-angle neutron scattering
Frontiers of Physics (2011)
