Abstract
Brosnan and de Waal1 report that capuchin monkeys show evidence of a sense of fairness or ‘inequity aversion’ because they rejected a less preferred reward when they saw a partner monkey receive a preferred reward for the same task. However, this does not show that monkeys are averse to inequity, only that they reject a lesser reward when better rewards are available. There are risks inherent in seeking anthropomorphic explanations for non-human behaviour.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brosnan, S. F. & de Waal, F. B. M. Nature 425, 297–299 (2003).
Wynne, C. D. L. Do Animals Think? (Princeton Univ. Press, in the press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wynne, C. Fair refusal by capuchin monkeys. Nature 428, 140 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/428140a
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/428140a
This article is cited by
-
Perceived reward attainability may underlie dogs’ responses in inequity paradigms
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
A lineage explanation of human normative guidance: the coadaptive model of instrumental rationality and shared intentionality
Synthese (2022)
-
A Risk-Reduction Model of Sharing: Role of Social Stimuli and Inequity
The Psychological Record (2017)
-
More Unequal in Income, More Unequal in Wellbeing
Social Indicators Research (2017)
-
Social comparison mediates chimpanzees’ responses to loss, not frustration
Animal Cognition (2014)


