Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Astrophysics

Is a doomsday catastrophe likely?

Abstract

The risk of a doomsday scenario in which high-energy physics experiments trigger the destruction of the Earth has been estimated to be minuscule1. But this may give a false sense of security: the fact that the Earth has survived for so long does not necessarily mean that such disasters are unlikely, because observers are, by definition, in places that have avoided destruction. Here we derive a new upper bound of one per billion years (99.9% confidence level) for the exogenous terminal-catastrophe rate that is free of such selection bias, using calculations based on the relatively late formation time of Earth.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The catastrophe timescale cannot be very short.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jaffe, R. L., Busza, W., Sandweiss, J. & Wilczek, F. Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 1125–1140 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hut, P. & Rees, M. J. Nature 302, 508–509 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dar, A. & De Rujula, A. Phys. Lett. B 470, 142–148 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Carter, B. in IAU Symposium 63 (ed. Longair, M. S.) 291–298 (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bostrom, N. Anthropic Bias: Observation Selection Effects in Science and Philosophy (Routledge, New York, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lineweaver, C. H., Fenner, Y. & Gibson, B. K. Science 203, 59–62 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max Tegmark.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tegmark, M., Bostrom, N. Is a doomsday catastrophe likely?. Nature 438, 754 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/438754a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/438754a

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing