Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Beyond the bond

Subjects

More than ever before, new techniques show the bond to be a convenient fiction, albeit one that holds the field of chemistry together, finds Philip Ball.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Coulson, C. A. The Spirit of Applied Mathematics 20–21 (Clarendon Press, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Comput. Chem. special issue 28, 1–466 (2007).

  3. Cortés-Guzmán, F. & Bader, R. F. W. Coord. Chem. Rev. 249, 633 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoffmann, R., Shaik, S. & Hiberty, P. C. Acc. Chem. Res. 36, 750–756 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Alvarez, S., Hoffmann, R. & Mealli, C. Chem. Eur. J. 36, 8358–8373 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pyykkö, P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 36, 1967–1997 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmidbaur, H., Cronje, S., Djordjevic, B. & Schuster, O. Chem. Phys. 36, 151–161 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Katz, M. J., Sakai, K. & Leznoff, D. B. Chem. Soc. Rev. 36, 1884–1895 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Crim, F. F. Science 249, 1387 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sukumar, N. Found. Chem. 36, 7–20 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Worth, G. A. & Cederbaum, L. S. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 36, 127–158 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sindelka, M., Moiseyev, N. & Cederbaum, L. S. preprint at http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1008.0741 (2010).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ball, P. Beyond the bond. Nature 469, 26–28 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/469026a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/469026a

This article is cited by

Comments

Commenting on this article is now closed.

  1. Oh I am so confused and surprised, this is one of the proofs that science is always changing, we learn about "bounds" since the high school, and now will be so difficult take out the so rooted idea of the "bound" how always we known.

  2. Indeed it is important to keep dynamics in mind, when talking about bonds. While a chemical bond is difficult to be defined, we have given a definition for a hydrogen bond through IUPAC recently and it can be viewed at
    http://media.iupac.org/repo...
    All comments welcome. Even for a hydrogen bond, one can not ignore the dynamics and any definition needs to take this into account. See for example
    http://www.rsc.org/Publishi...

  3. It is surprising to see that the author seems to have missed mentioning the 'Atoms in molecules' (poineered by Prof. Bader) approach based on electron density and analysis of its spatial distribution. This arguably comes closest to being a quantitative and rigorous description of bonding.

  4. Frankly, this article gives some voice to why I have always hated chemistry.

  5. Impressive article &#8211 so much packed in ! And it makes me feel a bit less worried about never really understanding bonding in school chem lessons.

  6. Perhaps definitions in science, like mathematics and poetry, is like water always slithering through our fingers.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing