Abstract
Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein comprising an RNA template, the telomerase-associated protein and its catalytic subunit, human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT). Telomerase activation is a critical step in cellular immortalisation and development of cancer. Enhanced telomerase activity has been demonstrated in cervical cancer. In the present study telomerase activity and hTERT mRNA expression were evaluated and correlated with the presence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cytological changes in the cervical lesions. Telomerase activity was assayed by telomeric repeat amplification protocol, hTERT mRNA expression by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and presence of high risk HPV (HR-HPV) infection by polymerase chain reaction. Out of 154 cervical samples of different cytology, 90 (58.44%) were positive for HR-HPV types 16/18, while among 55 normal cervical scrapes, 10 (18.18%) were HPV DNA positive. All 59 invasive cancer samples showed a very high telomerase activity. Among dysplasia, seven (63.6%) mild dysplasia, 18 (100%) of moderate, 20 (100%) of severe dysplasia and 6 (100%) carcinoma in situ (CIS) samples were positive with mild to moderate to high to very high telomerase activity respectively. Seven (12.7%) samples of apparently normal cervical scrapes were weakly positive for telomerase activity. We observed a good correlation (P<0.001) between telomerase activity and HR-HPV 16/18 positivity with a sensitivity of 88.1% for HPV and 100% for telomerase activity. It is suggested that telomerase activity may be used as an adjunct to cytology and HPV DNA testing in triaging women with cervical lesions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Cervical cancer is one of the most common causes of mortality among women worldwide with an annual incidence rate of approximately 400 000 cases and 200 000 deaths per year (Parkin et al, 2001). The greatest burden of the disease is in developing countries where lack of organised screening facility contributes to nearly one quarter of all female cancers. In developed countries Pap smear screening is associated with a 75% reduction in the incidence of cervical cancer (Kurman et al, 1994).
Clinical and molecular epidemiological studies demonstrated convincingly that certain types of human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are the primary causal agents in the development of cervical carcinoma (Bosch and de Sanjose, 2002; Munoz et al, 2003). So far, more than 100 different types of HPV have been found and their nucleotide sequences have been characterised. Among them, 30 types have been linked to the development of anogenital cancers. Human papillomavirus types have been classified into ‘low’ and ‘high’ risk types based on their potential to induce tumourigenic transformation. HPV types 16,18,31,33,35,39,45,51,52,56,58,59,68,73 and 82 are considered as high risk types while 6,11,40,42,43,44,54,61,70,72,81 and CP6 108 as low risk types (Munoz et al, 2003). Among high risk HPV types, HPV 16 and 18 are considered to be carcinogenic agents and are strongly implicated with the development of cervical cancer (IARC Monographs Working Group, 1995; zur Hausen, 2001).
Studies on the oncogenic potential of these HPV types have clearly demonstrated that HR-HPVs are a necessary cause for the development of cervical cancer (Schiffman et al, 1993; Bosch et al, 1995) but only a small proportion of women with cytological abnormalities or infected with HR-HPV types will eventually progress to invasive cancer with majority of infections is cleared spontaneously, which suggests the view that although infection with HPV is essential but it may not be sufficient for the development of cervical cancer. Only persistent HPV infection may lead to the development of invasive cervical cancer. Screening of cervical cancer is essentially carried out by the Pap smear test, which although effective in detecting high risk premalignant and malignant cervical cells, it suffers from high false negative rates, intra- and interpersonnel and laboratory variations. New screening strategies, including testing for HR-HPV DNA as an adjunct to cytology to triage and monitor cervical lesions have been advocated. Involvement of other cellular and molecular events in the HPV-induced cervical carcinogenesis turned the focus to identify other molecular markers for effective screening and diagnosing cervical pre and invasive malignancies.
Recent observations support the concept that activation of telomerase is a critical step in cellular immortalisation and cancer. Telomeres, the ends of chromosomes are specialised DNA-protein complexes, composed of TTAGGG repeats. They play an important role in genomic integrity and stability by preventing the recognition of chromosomal ends as double-stranded DNA breaks. Telomerase synthesises (TTAGGG)n DNA repeats onto chromosome ends. It is a ribonucleoprotein complex, consisting of an internal RNA component human telomerase RNA (hTR), a catalytic protein subunit, human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) and other associated proteins namely hTP1 etc. Most adult somatic cells exhibit low or no telomerase activity and thus experience progressive telomere attrition with each round of cell cycle. In contrast, germline cells, differentiating cells and tumour cells have elevated or detectable levels of telomerase activity and have long or stable telomeres. Consequently, telomerase may be required for the long-term proliferation of tumours. Stabilisation of telomere lengths by activation of telomerase is thought to be the key mechanism of indefinite cell proliferation and immortalisation. Telomerase activity has been reported in different tumour types (Kim et al, 1995). Elevated levels of telomerase activity have been detected in invasive cervical carcinomas, as well as in high-grade cervical dysplasias. A few investigators also reported low telomerase activity in normal, inflammatory and premalignant cervical lesions (Zheng et al, 1997; Wisman et al, 2000).
The main transforming genes of HPV 16 and other HR-HPV types are E6 and E7. HPV E6 protein generally target and degrade tumour-suppressor protein, p53, through ubiquitin pathway (Scheffner et al, 1990, 1993; Werness et al, 1990). However, it has also been reported to bind to a number of other cellular proteins and has functions that are independent of p53 degradation including the activation of telomerase (Rapp and Chen, 1998). Sprague et al (2002) indicated that HPV-16 by itself does not necessarily cause telomerase activation in cervical keratinocytes, but rather, supports a model in which HPV-16 facilitates telomerase activation in conjunction with other viral or cellular changes over time. Given that HPV infection has been associated with majority of the cases of invasive cervical cancers, it may be deduced that, telomerase activation may be a critical pathway by which HPV infection facilitates malignant transformation of the cervical epithelium, making it an ideal marker for cervical cancer screening. In India, cancer of the uterine cervix is the major cancer in women and infection of HPV has been detected in more than 98% cases (Das et al, 1992a, 1992b). There are, however, only a few studies from India where an attempt has been made to augment skeletal cervical cytology screening programme. Recently, Arora et al (2005) suggested that HR-HPV detection can be utilised as an adjunct to routine cytology screening programmes to identify ‘high risk’ women who have concurrently negative Pap smears but may harbour oncogenic HPV infection and/or are more likely to develop cervical intraepithelial neoplastic lesions.
In the present study, we investigated whether the status of HPV infection, telomerase activity, hTERT, hTR and hTP1 mRNA expressions in cervical tissues and/or cervical scrapes have clinical value in the triage of women or useful as an adjunct to cytology, particularly undefined or atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and mild, moderate or severe dyskaryosis.
Materials and methods
This study was conducted in 154 tissue biopsies from patients in the age group 25–60 years and included 59 invasive cervical carcinomas, 55 dysplastic tissues belonging to various grades namely, mild (n=11), moderate (n=18), severe dysplasias (n=20) and CIS (n=6) cases and 40 normal cervical tissue controls. The study also included 55 cervical scrapes from asymptomatic, normal healthy women. All the biopsies were colposcopy-directed, and were either histopathologically or cytologically confirmed by the pathologists. Before taking punch biopsy, cervical scrapes were taken from all invasive cancer patients.
The biopsy specimens of cervical carcinomas were collected from women attending the ‘cancer clinic’ at Obstetrics and Gynaecology out-patient department (OPD) of Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi. The clinical staging of the tumours ranged from stage I to stage IV and their histological tumour grading was either of poor, moderate or well-differentiated squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas and subtypes thereof. Control biopsy specimens were collected from asymptomatic, apparently normal women visiting OPD and undergoing hysterectomy for gynaecological reasons other than cervical cancer such as fibroids, dysfunctional uterine bleeding etc. Cervical scrapes were also collected from asymptomatic normal women coming for checkups other than gynaecological complaints. Informed consent was obtained from each patient before recruitment for the study.
Biopsies and the scraped cervical cells were collected in chilled PBS and transported from cancer clinic to the laboratory on ice. Each biopsy specimen was bisected after grossing by pathologists; one-half was subjected to histopathological examination after fixing the sample in 10% formaldehyde. The remaining half was employed for DNA and RNA extraction. The whole procedure was completed within 3 h from the time of collection.
HPV analysis
Genomic DNA was extracted from the cervical tissues/scrapes using Proteinase K/phenol-chloroform method. Human papillomavirus detection was carried out by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), using the consensus primers MY09 and MY11, with an expected product size of about 450 base pairs (bp), for the amplification of the most conserved LI region of the HPV genome. A gene fragment of the β-globin was used as an internal control to check the integrity of the specimens. Further HPV typing was carried out using type-specific primers for HPV types 16, 18, 6 and 11 (Das et al, 1992a). Polymerase chain reaction products were separated electrophoretically on an ethidium bromide stained 3% Nusieve agarose gel. Each PCR reaction included a positive and a negative control.
Estimation of telomerase activity by TRAP assay
A portion of the tissue grinded in liquid nitrogen (40–100 mg) was suspended in 200 μl ice-cold CHAPS lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride, 1 mM EGTA, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 0.5% CHAPS and 10% glycerol). After 30 min of incubation on ice, lysates were centrifuged at 10 000 r.p.m. for 20 min at 4°C, the supernatant was aliquoted and stored at −70°C until used for assay.
Telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) assay was carried out as described by Kim et al (1995) with minor modifications in 50 μl reaction mixture containing (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 63 mM KCl, 0.005% Tween-20, 1 mM EGTA, 50 μ M each of dNTPs, 1 μg of T4 gene 32 protein (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany), bovine serum albumin (1 mg ml−1), 0.1 μg of TS primer (5′-AATCCGTCGAGCAGAGTT-3′) and [α-P32]dCTP10Ci/μl (specific activity 3000 Ci mmole−1) with 5 μg of protein. After telomerase mediated strand formation 0.1 μg of CX primer was added at 72°C and PCR amplification was performed. Lysate from HeLa cells were used as positive control. Sample treated with RNAse A was treated as negative control. Lysis buffer was used as reagent blank to monitor reagent contamination.
The PCR products were then analysed by electrophoresis on 12% polyacrylamide nondenaturing gel and autoradiographed. The level of telomerase activity was quantified by comparing the density of the ladder signals with the positive control (HeLa cells) and expressed in relative units (RU). Samples which did not give ladder were comparable to negative control and were graded as 0, the ladder which gave stronger signal compared to positive signal as 4+(++++), equal signal as 3+, moderate as 2+ and mild in 1+ RU.
Expression analysis of telomerase components hTERT, hTR and hTP1
RNA was extracted from the tissue biopsies using TRI reagent according to the manufacturer's specifications. The cDNA was synthesised for each of the sample using 5 μg μl−1 of RNA. The reaction was carried out in 20 μl containing 50 ng of random hexamer primers (N6) (Bangalore Genei, Bangalore, India), 250 μmol of each of nucleotides (dATP, dCTP, dGTP and dTTP), 0.1 M of dithiothreitol, 40 U μl−1 of RNAse inhibitor (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and MMLV reverse transcriptase (Gibco BRL, NY, USA). The cDNAs were stored at −70°C until PCR amplification.
Two microlitre of cDNA was taken in a total volume of 50 μl reaction mixture, containing 10 mM dNTPs, 10 μ M of each set of primers, 5 U of Taq DNA polymerase, by using gene-specific primers for hTERT, hTR and hTP1 along with the primers for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH). The cDNA was amplified for 36, 32 and 30 cycles, respectively, for hTERT, hTR, hTP1 along with house keeping gene G3PDH. The amplified PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis on ethidium bromide stained 1.5% agarose gel and visualised in BIO-RAD gel documentation system.
Results
Detection of HPV by PCR
In all, 52 out of 59 invasive cervical carcinomas (88.1%), 38 of 55 (69.1%) dysplasias, two (5%) out of 40 normal control tissues and 13 of 55 (23.6%) normal cervical scrapes were positive for HPV by LI consensus primers. Further typing of HR-HPV 16 and 18 was carried out by PCR amplification of most conserved upstream regulatory region (URR) sequence of HPV 16, which results in a PCR product of 217, and 100 bp band HPV 18 E6 region (Figure 1).
Table 1 demonstrates, out of 59 cervical tumour biopsies, 50 (84.7%) were positive for HPV type 16 and two (3.39%) for HPV type 18. None of the invasive tumour samples showed amplification for other two HPV types (6 and 11). Thus, the positivity for HR-HPV types 16/18 as revealed by PCR was 88.14%. Polymerase chain reaction amplification of 55 cervical dysplasia samples revealed 36 cases (65.4%) of HPV type 16. The break-up of HPV type 16 positivity among dysplasia cases was six (54.5%) of mild, 10 (55.5%) of moderate, 20 (76.9%) of severe dysplasia which include five cases of CIS, respectively. two samples (5%) of normal control tissues were positive for oncogenic HPV type 16 and remaining 38 samples were negative for any type of HPV infection as revealed by consensus primers. Polymerase chain reaction amplification for HPV 16 in normal cervical scrapes revealed 10 (18.18%) positive cases out of which one sample (1. 81%) was also positive for HPV 18 (Table 1).
Telomerase activity
All 59 (100%) invasive cervical tumours showed a very high telomerase activity when compared to that of controls (5%). Cervical smears from the same patients also showed similar increased activity. Of the 55 dysplasia samples, seven (63.6%) of 11 mild dysplasia, samples revealed low telomerase activity. While all 18 (100%) moderate, 20 (100%) of severe dysplasia and six (100%) of CIS cases were positive for moderate to high to very high telomerase activity respectively. Out of 40 normal control tissues only two (5%) were positive for telomerase activity but seven cases (12.7%) of apparently normal cervical scrapes showed weak telomerase activity. Telomerase activity in different cervical lesions is shown in Figure 2.
Telomerase activity and HPV status in cervical lesions
Table 1 demonstrates associations, sensitivity and specificity of telomerase activity and HPV status in normal and abnormal cervical lesions. The HR-HPV 16/18 infection (OR 141.1, P<0.001) showed 88.1% sensitivity in invasive carcinomas compared to 100% sensitivity of telomerase activity. It is further observed that as the positivity of oncogenic HPV types 16/18 increased telomerase activity also increased with the increased severity of the disease. Severe dysplasia cases showed 100% sensitivity for telomerase activity compared to 76.9% for HPV. Telomerase activity thus appears to be a better molecular marker than HR-HPV 16/18 in detecting lesions even in mild dysplasia cases. Table 2 shows 88.1% concordance between telomerase activity and HPV status in invasive cervical carcinomas, 69.1% in dysplasias and 100% in normal cervical tissues. The extent of agreement in positivity among ‘normal’ scrape samples of 55 women also showed a good concordance (94.5%) between HPV and telomerase methods.
Expression analysis of telomerase components hTERT, hTR and hTP1
RT–PCR experiments for hTERT, hTR and hTP1 mRNA expressions revealed that both hTR and hTP1 were constitutively expressed in all invasive carcinomas, dysplastic lesions and normal controls of the uterine cervix. However, the expression of hTERT levels was greater in invasive cervical cancer samples and showed an increasing trend with the increasing grade of dysplasia/cervical cancer (Figure 3).
As regards to hTERT, a very high expression levels was observed in all 59 invasive cervical carcinomas, which also well correlated with their high telomerase activity. Human telomerase reverse transcriptase expression in eight mild, 18 moderate, 20 severe dysplastic lesions and six CIS cases ranged from mild to moderate to high and very high levels, respectively. While seven samples of normal cervical scrapes revealed a weak hTERT mRNA expression, none of the normal control tissue samples had any detectable levels of hTERT expression. A specific PCR amplimer of 145 bp for hTERT and a 103 bp for hTR are shown in Figure 3. The extent of hTERT expression shows a significant correlation with the level of telomerase activity and the grade of the disease (P<0.001).
hTERT, hTR and hTP1 mRNA expressions in relation to HPV
When HPV infection in the different categories of cervical lesions was correlated with the expression of telomerase components hTERT, hTR and hTP1 as determined by RT–PCR, a good correlation with the presence of oncogenic HPV type 16 was observed. Human telomerase reverse transcriptase expression was detected in as many as 88 of 90 (97.8%) specimens which were positive for HR-HPV type 16, with the exception of only one (1.11%) of HPV-positive samples not expressing hTERT (P<0.001). Human telomerase RNA and hTP1 expressions were found even in HPV negative samples, although not as high as in HPV-positive samples. However, their expression levels increased with increasing severity of the disease.
Statistics
The Fisher's exact test was used for comparisons between groups. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS (version 10) software.
Discussion
We studied the relationship between HPV status, telomerase activity, hTERT, hTR, hTP1 mRNA expression during the development of cervical cancer through different grades of cervical dysplasia to invasive cervical cancer.
Cytology is considered as the gold standard for the diagnosis of dysplastic and invasive uterine cervical lesions. Pap smear test routinely employed for the diagnosis of premalignant cervical lesions is, however, found to have variable sensitivity and specificity. Testing for oncogenic type of HPVs is another viable method to screen women with cytological abnormalities since HR-HPV infections are considered as the most common causal factor and are reported in more than 90% of cervical cancers (Das et al, 1992b; Bosch et al, 1995; Bosch and de Sanjose, 2002). We have considered only four HPV types (HPV 16,18,6 and 11) that are highly prevalent in and around Delhi for this study. HPV types 16 and 18 constitute almost 90% of cervical cancers in India and the presence of other high risk types is very low or nil (Das et al, 1992a, 1992b; Gopalkrishna et al, 2000; Franceschi et al, 2005). It has been reported that 10–35% of normal healthy women harbour HPV DNA in their cervical epithelium depending on the screening method, age of the women, number of subjects studied and their geographic locations (Lorincz et al, 1986, 1992; Toorn et al, 1986). In the present study only 5% of normal control tissues (n=40) compared to 18% of (n=10) normal cervical scrapes were positive for HR-HPV types 16/18 infection. This observation in the present study is interesting. It is possible that these women who were attending OPD with symptomatic complaints, may not really be normal women in strict sense, thus they may be having latent or an occult or commensal papillomavirus infection, that is, the presence of HPV DNA in the absence of a visible, histologic or cytologic abnormality. Oriel (1971) coined the lag period between exposure to HPV infection and development of clinical disease as ‘latent infection’, which was approximately 4 months, which is corroborated by Kreider et al (1987) experimentally, in their studies. The reason may be that the virus might be present in latent state and/or in unintegrated form without affecting cellular morphology, which shows up in Pap test. This transient infection may be cleared by immune system in majority of women in due course of time. However, those persisting may be integrated into the host cell genome and progress to carcinoma. It is also known that transformation of HPV appears to involve HPV DNA integration into host genome. Further the progress and outcome of an HPV infection depend on the HPV type, viral load and the nature and timing of local and tissue influences (Cheng et al, 1995; Jian et al, 1998).
HPV type 16 was found to be the most prevalent type (84.7%) which is in agreement with other studies, while the frequency of HPV type 18 (3.38) is very low when compared to other ethnic population (Durst et al, 1983; Yoshikawa et al, 1985; Das et al, 1992b; Bosch et al, 1995; Clifford et al, 2003) but it is consistent with Indian data (Das et al, 1992a, 1992b). Absence of any HPV type in seven cervical tumours indicates that some other mechanism/factors or a hitherto unknown HPV-dependent pathway also exists for the genesis of cervical cancer. The overall HPV positivity in 55 cervical dysplastic lesions including carcinoma-in-situ was 69.1%. The results were comparable to earlier published reports (van Den Brule et al, 1991; Cornelissen et al, 1992; Cuzick et al, 1994; Holowaty et al 1999; Voglino et al, 2000; Reddy et al, 2001). The positivity of high risk HPVs 16 and 18 was found to be 64.5%. One CIS sample was positive for both HPV 16 and HPV 18. The break up of HR-HPV type 16 positivity in mild, moderate, severe and in CIS was 54.5, 55.5, 75.0 and 83.3%, respectively. Similar prevalence was shown for HPV type 16 and 18 in dysplastic lesions by other authors (van Den Brule et al, 1991; Cornelissen et al, 1992; Cuzick et al, 1994; Holowaty et al, 1999; Voglino et al, 2000). Observation of a higher frequency of HR-HPV types in women with severe dysplastic lesions and CIS than in mild dysplsia is also in agreement with earlier reports (McCance et al, 1985; Cornelissen et al, 1992; Cuzick et al, 1994; Delvenne et al 1994). Gradual increase in the frequency of high risk HPV types 16 and 18 from mild to moderate to severe dysplastic lesions to invasive cervical cancer suggests that the frequency of high risk HR-HPV infection changes as a function of severity of cervical lesions.
Besides being an important risk factor for cervical cancer, HPV has been found to activate telomerase with its E6 oncoprotein (Klingelhutz et al, 1996). Ex vivo studies showed that transfection of normal epithelial cervical keratinocytes with the HPV E6 gene resulted in telomerase activation even before the occurrence of ‘crisis’ (Klingelhutz et al, 1996). It has been observed that low-grade dysplasias with the infection of HR-HPV 16 and 18 showed a higher rate of progression to malignancy (Reid et al, 1987; Das et al, 1989; Cuzick et al, 1992). It suggests that those early lesions infected with high risk HPV 16 could be induced to progress because of induction of telomerase activity by their E6 oncoprotein.
Activation of telomerase at a site, which is normally telomerase negative, indicates the presence of immortal or malignant cells (Hiyama et al, 1995; Sommerfield et al, 1996). Reddy et al (2001) reported 100% telomerase positivity in 29 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) IB, IIB, IIIA and IIIB. Several authors (Kyo et al, 1997; Meeker and Coffey, 1997; Zheng et al, 1997; Shroyer et al, 1998; Wisman et al, 2000) in survey on human malignancies reported 88–100% telomerase activity. Cervical cancers exhibit high telomerase activity irrespective of histopathology grading but the intensity/level of telomerase activity increased with the clinical progression of the disease.
In the present study, we observed weak telomerase activity in seven (64.6%) of 11 mild dysplasia samples. All 18 moderate, 26 severe dysplasias which included six CIS samples were positive for moderate to high to very high telomerase activity, respectively. High telomerase activity in all samples of CIS, at par with invasive carcinomas, is justified since this stage is a pre-invasive stage. Similar results were reported by several other authors (Kyo et al, 1997; Zheng et al, 1997; Shroyer et al, 1998; Zhang et al, 1999; Wisman et al, 2000). Meeker and Coffey (1997) noted 46% telomerase positivity in cervical precancerous tissues where as Snijders et al (1998) reported low telomerase positivity in CIN lesions. The high percentage of telomerase activity in the present study group may be due to the presence of more number of severe dysplasia cases. The very presence of telomerase activity in the preneoplastic cervical tissues indicates that telomerase is activated early in the course of cervical carcinogenesis and may be a vital constituent of malignant progression. The HR-HPV 16/18 infection showed 88.1% sensitivity in invasive carcinomas compared to 100% sensitivity of telomerase activity. It is further observed that as the positivity of oncogenic HPV types 16/18 increased telomerase activity also increased with the increased severity of the disease. Severe dysplasia cases showed 100% sensitivity for telomerase activity compared to 76.9% for HPV. This indicates a good association between HPV infection and activation of telomerase during cervical carcinogenesis.
Cervical scrapes collected from the same cervical cancer patients (n=59) also revealed similar results suggesting that the telomerase activity of exfoliated cells reflects that of the lesions or tumour tissues. This is a very interesting finding which indicates that cervical exfoliated cells can be used for the detection of telomerase activity. It will help in easy screening of women for telomerase activity along with Pap test in the same scraped cervical cells. Possible inhibition of the TRAP assay by the presence of normal cervical cells is not going to interfere with sensitivity of the assay since Kyo et al (1997) observed that the detection limit of TRAP assay was 100 cancer cells. Furthermore, Wisman et al (2001) successfully assayed telomerase activity even in 10 cervical cells.
We observed a positive association between telomerase activity and infection with HR-HPV type 16/18. These findings are in accordance with earlier reports (Zheng et al, 1997), which suggest telomerase activation as an early event occurring during cervical neoplastic transformation and HPV infection (Yashima et al, 1998). Consequently, monitoring telomerase activity could also have potential prognostic significance.
When we assessed association of HR-HPV types 16 and 18 with telomerase activity, we observed that, of seven samples of mild dysplasia that were positive for telomerase activity, six of these were positive for HR-HPV type 16 and one for low risk HPV type 11. Absence of telomerase activity in four mild dysplasia samples suggests that they belong to those groups of cases who may not progress since there are some percentages of dysplastic lesions, which revert back to normalcy. During the study of biology of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs) using PCR based clonality assay, Park et al (1996) revealed that LSILs include two types of lesions that are biologically distinct; one is monoclonal and associated with malignant HPV types while the other is polyclonal and associated with other HPV types. As monoclonality is a hallmark of neoplasia irrespective of organ type, the lesions that express telomerase activity appears to have the characteristics of neoplastic lesions. As reactivation of telomerase activity is linked with malignancy, a follow-up of these samples only can determine the fate of these samples. Weak telomerase activity in seven normal cervical scrapes which were positive for HR-HPV types 16 and 18 makes an interesting observation. The cytology reports for these samples were inflammation (n=2) and ASC-US (n=1) and the colposcopic examination revealed cervical erosion in four cases. This is in agreement with earlier studies that showed presence of mild telomerase activity even in ASC-US, inflammation and cervical erosions (Kyo et al, 1997; Shroyer et al, 1998; Wisman et al, 2000). It is also known that the presence of HPV 16 E6 protein can activate telomerase activity irrespective of cells entering ‘crisis’ stage (Klingelhutz et al, 1996).
It has been established that there is variation in the interpretation of ASC-US Pap smears even among expert cytopathologists (Sherman et al, 1994). ASC-US/LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) recommends HPV DNA testing in women with ASC-US but not in LSIL (Sherman et al, 2002). This brings forth the debate over the subject that whether all women with abnormal cervical smear should be referred and treated (Flannelly and Kitchener, 1995). It may look too radical since only 1% of women with CIN I are estimated to progress to invasive cervical cancer (Holowaty et al, 1999). In addition, identifying women with abnormal cervical changes put such women under stress that they are at a risk of developing cervical cancer, when in fact majority of them never develop the disease (Raffle et al, 1995). The presence of telomerase activity in the whole range of cervical samples from mild dysplasia to stage IV cancers suggests that telomerase is activated early and play an essential role during cervical carcinogenesis. The average telomerase activity increased with the progression of the clinical stage. The gradual elevation of telomerase activity from mild to moderate to high to very high telomerase activity in different dysplsia and invasive cancer samples indicate that with the progression of the disease there is a concomitant increase in the telomerase activity (Kyo et al, 1997; Shroyer et al, 1998: Wisman et al, 2001; Baege et al, 2002).
The levels of hTERT mRNA expression complemented well with the telomerase activity levels observed in different grades of cervical lesions to invasive cervical cancer samples. One mild dysplasia sample, which was negative for telomerase activity, expressed hTERT. This may be explained due to the upregulation of hTERT before the reactivation of telomerase activity. Similar observations were made in other cancers including cervical cancer by several authors (Kyo et al, 1997; Nakano et al, 1998; Shroyer et al, 1998; Wisman et al, 2001).
It is remarkable that high rates of cervical cancer deaths still occur despite the fact that cervical cancer is an excellent model for early detection due to long interval between the time of infection or initial lesions and development of invasive cancer with a well-known natural history. Early identification and intervention should have a significant impact on the reduction of cervical cancer morbidity and mortality. Identification of women at risk for cervical cancer would not only minimise the unnecessary follow-up visits a woman has to undergo, but would also avoid invasive procedures without compromising on the disease detection. We suggest that telomerase activation is a relatively early-stage event in cervical carcinogenesis, and this activation is associated with the initiation and progression of cervical lesions. Detection of telomerase activity may serve as a tool for reliable diagnosis and prognosis of cervical neoplasias along with cytology and HPV testing.
Change history
16 November 2011
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
Arora R, Kumar A, Prusty BK, Kailash U, Das BC (2005) Prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) types 16 and 18 in healthy women with cytologically negative Pap smear. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 121: 104–109
Baege AC, Berger A, Schlegel R, Veldman T, Schlegel R (2002) Cervical epithelial cells transduced with the papillomavirus E6/E7 oncogenes maintain stable levels of oncoprotein expression but exhibit progressive, major increases in hTERT gene expression and telomerase activity. Am J Pathol 160: 1251–1257
Bosch FX, de Sanjose S (2002) Human papillomavirus in cervical cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 4: 175–183
Bosch FX, Manos MM, Munoz N, Sherman M, Jansen AM, Peto J, Schiffman MH, Moreno V, Kurman R, Shah KV (1995) Prevalence of human papillomavirus in cervical cancer: a worldwide perspective. International biological study on cervical cancer (IBSCC) Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 87: 796–802
Cheng S, Schmidt-Grimminger DC, Murant T, Broker TR, Chow LT (1995) Differentiation-dependent up-regulation of the human papillomavirus E7 gene reactivates cellular DNA replication in suprabasal differentiated keratinocytes. Genes Dev 9: 2335–2349
Clifford GM, Smith JS, Plummer M, Munoz N, Franceschi S (2003) Human papillomavirus types in invasive cervical cancer worldwide: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 88: 63–73
Cornelissen MT, Bots T, Briet MA, Jebbink MF, Struyk AP, van den Tweel JG, Greer CE, Smits HL, ter Schegget J (1992) Detection of human papillomavirus types by the polymerase chain reaction and the differentiation between high-risk and low-risk cervical lesions. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol 62: 167–171
Cuzick J, Terry G, Ho L, Hollingworth T, Anderson M (1992) HPV in cervical smears. Lancet 340: 112–113
Cuzick J, Terry G, Ho L, Hollingworth T, Anderson M (1994) Type-specific human papillomavirus DNA in abnormal smears as a predictor of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Cancer 69: 167–171
Das BC, Sehgal A, Murthy NS, Gopalkrishna V, Sharma JK, Das DK, Singh V, Luthra UK (1989) Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer in Indian women. Lancet 2: 1271
Das BC, Sharma JK, Gopalakrishna V, Luthra UK (1992a) Analysis by polymerase chain reaction of the physical state of human papillomavirus type 16 DNA in cervical preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions. J Gen Virol 73: 2327–2336
Das BC, Sharma JK, Gopalkrishna V, Das DK, Singh V, Gissmann L, zur Hausen H, Luthra UK (1992b) A high frequency of human papillomavirus DNA sequences in cervical carcinomas of Indian women as revealed by Southern blot hybridization and polymerase chain reaction. J Med Virol 36: 239–245
Delvenne P, Fontaine MA, Delvenne C, Nikkels A, Boniver J (1994) Detection of human papillomaviruses in paraffin-embedded biopsies of cervical intraepithelial lesions:analysis by immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, and the polymerase chain reaction. Mod Pathol 7: 113–119
Durst M, Gissmann L, Ikenberg H, zur Hausen H (1983) A papillomavirus DNA from a cervical carcinoma and its prevalence in cancer biopsy samples from different geographic regions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80: 3812–3815
Flannelly G, Kitchener H (1995) Every women with an abnormal cervical smear should be referred for treatment: debate. Clin Obstet Gynecol 38(3): 585–591
Franceschi S, Rajkumar R, Snijders PJ, Arslan A, Mahe C, Plumeer M, Sankarnarayanan R, Cherian J, Meijer CJ, Weiderpass F (2005) Papillomavirus infection in rural women in Southern India. Br J Cancer 92: 601–606
Gopalkrishna V, Hedau S, Kailash U, Das BC (2000) Human papillomavirus type 16 in cancer of the uterine cervix in different geographical regions of India. Conference on Human Papillomavirus Barcelona, Spain Abstract 138
Hiyama K, Hirai Y, Kyoizumi S, Akiyama M, Hiyama E, Piatyszek MA, Shay JW, Ishioka S, Yamakido M (1995) Activation of telomerase in human lymphocytes and hematopoietic progenitor cells. J Immunol 155: 3711–3715
Holowaty P, Miller AB, Rohan T, To T (1999) Natural history of dysplasia of the uterine cervix. J Natl Cancer Inst 91: 252–258
IARC Monographs Working Group (1995) Human Papillomaviruses. Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Vol. 64, International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France
Jian Y, Schmidt-Grimminger DC, Chien WM, Wu X, Broker TR, Chow LT (1998) Post-transcriptional induction of p21cip1 protein by human papillomavirus E7 inhibits unscheduled DNA synthesis reactivated in differentiated keratinocytes. Oncogene 17: 2027–2038
Kim NW, Piatyszek MA, Prowse KR, Harley CB, West MD, Ho PL, Coviello GM, Wright WE, Weinrich SL, Shay JW (1995) Specific association of human telomerase activity with immortal cells and cancer. Science 266: 2011–2015
Klingelhutz AJ, Foster SA, McDougall JK (1996) Telomerase activation by the E6 gene product of human papillomavirus type 16. Nature 380: 79–82
Kreider JW, Howett MK, Leure-Dupree AE, Zaino RJ, Weber JA (1987) Laboratory production in vivo of infectious human papillomavirus type 11. J Virol 61: 590–593
Kurman RJ, Henson DE, Herbst AL, Noller KL, Schiffman MH (1994) Interim guidelines for management of abnormal cervical cytology. The 1992 National Cancer Institute Workshop. JAMA 271: 1866–1869
Kyo S, Takakura M, Ishikawa H, Sasagawa T, Satake S, Tateno M, Inoue M (1997) Application of telomerase assay for the screening of cervical lesions. Cancer Res 57: 1863–1867
Lorincz AT, Lancaster WD, Temple GF (1986) Cloning and characterization of the DNA of a new human papillomavirus from a woman with dysplasia of the uterine cervix. J Virol 58: 225–229
Lorincz AT, Reid R, Jenson AB, Greenberg MD, Lancaster W, Kurman RJ (1992) Human papillomavirus infection of the cervix: relative risk associations of 15 common anogenital types. Obstet Gynecol 79: 328–337
McCance DJ, Campion MJ, Clarkson PK, Chesters PM, Jenkins D, Singer A (1985) Prevalence of human papillomavirus type 16 DNA sequences in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Br J Obstet Gynecol 92: 1101
Meeker AK, Coffey DS (1997) Telomerase: a promising marker of biological immortality of germ, stem, and cancer cells. A review. Biochemistry (Moscow) 62: 1323–1331
Munoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjose S, Herrero R, Castellsague X, Shah KV, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ, International Agency for Research on Cancer Multicenter Cervical Cancer Study Group (2003) Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 348: 518–527
Nakano K, Watney E, McDougall JK (1998) Telomerase activity and expression of telomerase RNA component and telomerase catalytic subunit gene in cervical cancer. Am J Pathol 153: 857–864
Oriel JD (1971) Natural history of genital warts. Br J Vener Dis 47: 1–13
Park TW, Richart RM, Sun XW, Wright Jr TC (1996) Association between human papillomavirus type and clonal status of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. J Natl Cancer Inst 88: 355–358
Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2001) Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000. Int J Cancer 94: 153–156
Raffle AE, Alden B, Mackenzie EF (1995) Detection rates for abnormal cervical smears: what are we screening for? Lancet 345: 1469–1473
Rapp L, Chen JJ (1998) The papillomavirus E6 proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1378: F1–F19
Reddy VG, Khanna N, Jain SK, Das BC, Singh N (2001) Telomerase-A molecular marker for cervical cancer screening. Int J Gynecol Cancer 11: 100–106
Reid R, Greenberg M, Jenson AB, Husain M, Willett J, Daoud Y, Temple G, Stanhope CR, Sherman AI, Phibbs GD, Lorincz AJ (1987) Sexually transmitted papillomaviral infections. I. The anatomic distribution and pathologic grade of neoplastic lesions associated with different viral types. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156: 212–222
Scheffner M, Huibregtse JM, Vierstra RD, Howley PM (1993) The HPV-16 E6 and E6-AP complex functions as a ubiquitin-protein ligase in the ubiquitination of p53. Cell 75: 495–505
Scheffner M, Werness BA, Hubregste JM, Levine AJ, Howley PM (1990) The E6 oncoprotein encoded by human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 promotes the degradation of p53. Cell 63: 1129–1136
Schiffman MH, Bauer HM, Hoover RN, Glass AG, Cadell DM, Rush BB, Scott DR, Sherman ME, Kurman RJ, Wacholder S, Stanton CK, Manos MM (1993) Epidemiologic evidence showing that human papillomavirus infection causes most cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 958–964
Sherman ME, Schiffman M, Cox JT, Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study Group (2002) Effects of age and human papilloma viral load on colposcopy triage: data from the randomized Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study (ALTS). J Natl Cancer Inst 94: 102–107
Sherman ME, Schiffman MH, Lorincz AT, Manos MM, Scott DR, Kuman RJ, Kiviat NB, Stoler M, Glass AG, Rush BB (1994) Toward objective quality assurance in cervical cytopathology. Correlation of cytopathologic diagnoses with detection of high-risk human papillomavirus types. Am J Clin Pathol 102: 182–187
Shroyer KR, Thompson LC, Enomoto T, Eskens JL, Shroyer AL, McGregor JA (1998) Telomerase expression in normal epithelium, reactive atypia, squamous dysplasia, and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Am J Clin Pathol 109: 153–162
Snijders PJ, van Duin M, Walboomers JM, Steenbergen RD, Risse EK, Helmerhorst TJ, Verheijen RH, Meijer CJ (1998) Telomerase activity exclusively in cervical carcinomas and a subset of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III lesions: strong association with elevated messenger RNA levels of its catalytic subunit and high-risk human papillomavirus DNA. Cancer Res 58: 3812–3818
Sommerfield HJ, Meeker AK, Piatyszek MA, Bova GS, Shay JW, Coffey DS (1996) Telomerase activity a prevalent marker of malignant human prostate tissue. Cancer Res 56: 218–222
Sprague DL, Phillips SL, Mitchell CJ, Berger KL, Lace M, Turek LP, Klingelhutz AJ (2002) Telomerase activation in cervical keratinocytes containing stably replicating human papillomavirus type 16 episomes. Virology 301: 247–254
Toorn PG, Arrand JR, Wilson LP, Sharp DS (1986) Human papillomavirus infection of the uterine cervix of women without cytological signs of neoplasia. Br Med J 293: 1261–1264
Van Den Brule AJ, Walboomers JM, Du Maine M, Kenemans P, Meijer CJ (1991) Difference in prevalence of human papillomavirus genotypes in cytomorphologically normal cervical smears is associated with a history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Cancer 48: 404–408
Voglino G, Poso F, Privitera S, Parisio F, Ghiringhello B, Gordini G, Chiara G, Massobrio M, Fessia L (2000) The role of human papillomavirus in cyto-histological practice: distribution and prevalenceof hig-risk strains (16, 18, 31, 33, and 35) in intraepithelial lesions and neoplasia of the uterine cervix. Pathologica 92: 516–523
Werness BA, Levine AJ, Howley PM (1990) Association of human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 E6 proteins with p53. Science 248: 76–79
Wisman GB, Jong SD, Meersma GJ, Helder MN, Hollema H, de Vries EG, Keith WN, van Der Zee AG (2000) Telomerase in (pre)neoplastic cervical disease. Human Pathol 31: 1304–1312
Wisman GB, Knol AJ, Helder MN, Krans M, DeVries EG, Hollema H, DeJong S, van der Zee AG (2001) Telomerase in relation to clinicipothologic prognostic factors and survival in survival in cervical cancer. Int J Cancer 91: 658–664
Yashima K, Ashfaq R, Nowak J, Von Gruenigen V, Milchgrub S, Rathi A, Albores-Saavedra J, Shay JW, Gazdar AF (1998) Telomerase activity and expression of its RNA component in cervical lesions. Cancer 82: 1319–1327
Yoshikawa H, Matsukura T, Yamamoto E, Kawana T, Mizuno M, Yoshiike K (1985) Occurrence of human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 DNA in cervical carcinomas from Japan: age of patients and histological type of carcinomas. Jpn J Cancer Res 76: 667–671
Zhang DK, Ngan HY, Cheng RY, Cheung AN, Liu SS, Tsao SW (1999) Clinical significance of telomerase activation and telomeric restriction fragment (TRF) in cervical cancer. Eur J Cancer 35: 154–160
Zheng PS, Iwasaka T, Yamasaki F, Ouchida M, Yokoyama M, Nakao Y, Fukuda K, Matsuyama T, Sugimori H (1997) Telomerase activity in gynecologic tumors. Gynecol Oncol 64: 171–175
zur Hausen H (2001) Oncogenic DNA viruses. Oncogene 20: 7820–7823
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the support received from Dr L Satyanarayana and Dr A Sehgal (Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Bio-Statistics, ICPO) for their help in the statistical evaluation of the data and Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) and Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India for financial assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Kailash, U., Soundararajan, C., Lakshmy, R. et al. Telomerase activity as an adjunct to high-risk human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 and cytology screening in cervical cancer. Br J Cancer 95, 1250–1257 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603375
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603375
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Human telomerase reverse transcriptase regulates vascular endothelial growth factor expression via human papillomavirus oncogene E7 in HPV-18-positive cervical cancer cells
Medical Oncology (2015)
-
The detection of hTERC amplification using fluorescence in situ hybridization in the diagnosis and prognosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a case control study
World Journal of Surgical Oncology (2012)
-
Berberine modulates AP-1 activity to suppress HPV transcription and downstream signaling to induce growth arrest and apoptosis in cervical cancer cells
Molecular Cancer (2011)
-
Aberrant promoter methylation and loss of Suppressor of Cytokine Signalling-1 gene expression in the development of uterine cervical carcinogenesis
Cellular Oncology (2011)
-
Transcription factor AP-1 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Alterations in activity and expression during Human Papillomavirus infection
BMC Cancer (2009)