Abstract
The work has been presented at The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) Annual Meeting, Fort Lauterdale, Florida, May 1999.
Purpose To evaluate inter- and intraobserver variability of the R/D score in assessing the iris configuration in Pigment Dispersion Syndrome patients.
Methods Fifty-seven high-resolution ultrasound biomicroscopy images were obtained by a single ophthalmologist. All images were examined twice by each of three ophthalmologists, the second assessment being at least 2 weeks after the first. Each observer was masked to their colleagues’ and their previous measurements. R/D scores were calculated at each examination. Agreement between and amongst observers was assessed using Bland–Altman plots. In addition, the R/D scores were categorised and reassessed using the Kappa statistic.
Results Intraobserver variability was small, the average differences between first and second scores of each observer being less than 0.01 units. Agreement within observers was 89% or higher, with Kappa values of 0.8 or higher, indicating almost perfect agreement. Interobserver variability was, however, greater. Although there was substantial agreement between two of the observers (87% agreement, first assessment; 80%, second assessment with respective kappa statistics of 0.78 and 0.66), they only moderately agreed with the other observer (kappa statistics between 0.55 and 0.68).
Conclusions This study suggests that when using R/D scores to demonstrate changes in iris configuration, assessments should preferably be made by the same observer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Pavlin CJ, Harasiewicz K, Sherar MD, Foster FS . Clinical use of ultrasound biomicroscopy. Ophthalmology 1991; 98: 287–295
Liebmann JM, Ritch R . Ultrasound biomicroscopy of the anterior segment. J Am Optom Assoc 1996; 67: 469–479
Pavlin CJ . Ultrasound biomicroscopy in pigment dispersion syndrome [letter; comment]. Ophthalmology 1994; 101: 1475–1477
Sokol J, Stegman Z, Liebmann JM, Ritch R . Location of the iris insertion in pigment dispersion syndrome. Ophthalmology 1996; 103: 289–293
Spaeth GL, Azuara-Blanco A, Araujo SV, Augsburger JJ . Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in evaluating the anterior chamber angle configuration by ultrasound biomicroscopy. J Glaucoma 1997; 6: 13–17
Tello C, Liebmann J, Potash SD, Cohen H, Ritch R . Measurement of ultrasound biomicroscopy images: intraobserver and interobserver reliability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994; 35: 3549–3552
Koch GG, Landis JR, Freeman JL, Freeman DHJ, Lehnen RC . A general methodology for the analysis of experiments with repeated measurement of categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 133–158
Landis JR, Koch GG . An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 1977; 33: 363–374
Landis JR, Koch GG . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–174
Pavlin CJ, Macken P, Trope G, Feldman F, Harasiewicz K, Foster FS . Ultrasound biomicroscopic features of pigmentary glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol 1994; 29: 187–192
Spaeth GL, Aruajo S, Azuara A . Comparison of the configuration of the human anterior chamber angle, as determined by the Spaeth gonioscopic grading system and ultrasound biomicroscopy. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1995; 93: 337–347
Urbak SF . Ultrasound biomicroscopy. I. Precision of measurements. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998; 76: 447–455
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balidis, M., Bunce, C., Boboridis, K. et al. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the R/D score for evaluation of iris configuration by ultrasound biomicroscopy, in patients with pigment dispersion syndrome. Eye 16, 722–726 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6700116
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6700116
