Abstract
Purpose
To report our experience of using Aqualase technology for cataract extraction.
Methods
In total, 33 patients (20 females; mean age 71.4 years) underwent cataract surgery using Aqualase through a 3.2-mm corneal incision. Grade of nucleus, nuclear removal technique, and intraoperative complications were noted. Clinical parameters from postoperative visits were collected.
Results
Aqualase is capable of removing cataracts up to nuclear sclerosis 2+ (out of 4) with relative ease. Nuclei graded 2+ or greater were technically more difficult and conversion to ultrasound phacoemulsification was required in one case. Two posterior capsule ruptures occurred: one during nucleus removal (contact with the tip while aspirating without Aqualase) and one unrelated to Aqualase during aspiration of cortex. Of 25 patients seen on the first postoperative day, 22 had a clear cornea. A total of 96% patients without preoperative comorbidity achieved 6/9 or better postoperatively. One patient had transient postoperative uveitis.
Conclusions
Removal of softer cataracts with Aqualase has the theoretical advantage over phacoemulsification, by carrying less risk to the posterior capsule, since the handpiece has a smooth polymer tip that has no mechanical motion inside the eye. However, the tip should not be considered entirely capsule-friendly, as rupture is possible with the foot-pedal in position two (aspiration only). Although certain adjustments to the technique are required, the method is similar enough to phacoemulsification to ensure a brief learning curve. With increasingly firm cataracts, Aqualase becomes less effective and ultrasound phacoemulsification is still superior for such cases, in our experience.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Minassian DC, Rosen P, Dart JK, Reidy A, Desai P, Sidhu M et al. Extracapsular cataract extraction compared with small incision surgery by phacoemulsification: a randomised trial. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85(7): 822–829.
Ionides A, Minassian D, Tuft S . Visual outcome following posterior capsule rupture during cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85(2): 222–224.
Desai P, Minassian DC, Reidy A . National cataract surgery survey 1997–8: a report of the results of the clinical outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83(12): 1336–1340.
Martin KR, Burton RL . The phacoemulsification learning curve: per-operative complications in the first 3000 cases of an experienced surgeon. Eye 2000; 14(Part 2): 190–195.
Tan JH, Karwatowski WS . Phacoemulsification cataract surgery and unplanned anterior vitrectomy—is it bad news? Eye 2002; 16(2): 117–120.
Fine IH, Packer M, Hoffman RS . New phacoemulsification technologies. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28(6): 1054–1060.
Mackool RJ, Brint SF . AquaLase: a new technology for cataract extraction. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004; 15(1): 40–43.
Chylack Jr LT, Leske MC, McCarthy D, Khu P, Kashiwagi T, Sperduto R . Lens opacities classification system II (LOCS II). Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107(7): 991–997.
Bourne RR, Minassian DC, Dart JK, Rosen P, Kaushal S, Wingate N . Effect of cataract surgery on the corneal endothelium: modern phacoemulsification compared with extracapsular cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 2004; 111(4): 679–685.
Sippel KC, Pineda Jr R . Phacoemulsification and thermal wound injury. Semin Ophthalmol 2002; 17(3–4): 102–109.
Bissen-Miyajima H, Shimmura S, Tsubota K . Thermal effect on corneal incisions with different phacoemulsification ultrasonic tips. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25(1): 60–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors have no proprietary or financial interest in issues relating to this work
This work was presented in video format at the Annual Congress of the Royal College of Ophthalmologists, May 2005
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hughes, E., Mellington, F. & Whitefield, L. Aqualase for cataract extraction. Eye 21, 191–194 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702162
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702162
