Correction to: British Journal of Cancer (2014) 110, 1488–1496. doi:10.1038/bjc.2014.50

One of the authors of the above paper had identified that Figure 7 was not reproduced correctly from their original flow data. The correct figure has been reproduced below.

Figure 7
figure 1

Cell cycle analysis of the effects of E2 and paclitaxel in the MCF7:5C cells. Representative cell cycle profiles of MCF7:5C cells treated with either 0.1% ethanol (Veh), E2 (1 nM) or paclitaxel (1μ M) for 12, 24 and 48 h. FL2-A represents the intensity of PI, and the y-axis represents the cell number.

The authors and publishers apologise for this mistake.