Abstract
In recent years, online counselling has been introduced in clinical genetics to increase patients’ access to care and to reduce time and cost for both patients and professionals. Most telegenetics reports so far evaluated online oncogenetic counselling at remote health centres in regions with large travelling distances, generally showing positive patient outcomes. We think online counselling – including the use of supportive tools that are also available during in-person counselling – of presymptomatic patients in their homes can also be feasible and valuable for patients in relatively small regions. We performed a single-centre pilot study of online genetic counselling for 57 patients who were presymptomatic cardiogenetic (n=17), presymptomatic oncogenetic (n=34) and prenatal (3 couples). One-third of presymptomatic patients we approached consented to online counselling. Patient evaluations of practical aspects, satisfaction and psychological outcomes were assessed and compared with a matched control group. Patients managed to fulfil the preparations, were significantly more satisfied with their counsellor and counselling session than controls and were satisfied with the online counselling more than they expected to be beforehand. Psychological outcomes (decreased anxiety and increased control) did not differ with control patients. Technical problems occurred in almost half of online sessions. Nonetheless, online counselling in patients’ homes proved to be feasible and was appreciated by a substantial part of presymptomatic patients at our genetics centre in the Netherlands. Based on these outcomes, we conclude online counselling can be a valuable addition to existing counselling options in regular patient care.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Zilliacus EM, Meiser B, Lobb EA, Kirk J, Warwick L, Tucker K : Are videoconferenced consultations as effective as face-to-face consultations for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic counseling? Genet Med 2011; 13: 933–941.
Meropol NJ, Daly MB, Vig HS et al: Delivery of internet-based cancer genetic counseling services to patients’ homes: a feasibility study. J Telemed Telecare 2011; 17: 36–40.
Abrams DJ, Geier MR : A comparison of patient satisfaction with telehealth and on-site consultations: a pilot study for prenatal genetic counseling. J Genet Couns 2006; 15: 199–205.
Stalker HJ, Wilson R, McCune H, Gonzalez J, Moffett M, Zori RT : Telegenetic medicine: improved access to services in an underserved area. J Telemed Telecare 2006; 12: 182–185.
Coelho JJ, Arnold A, Nayler J, Tischkowitz M, MacKay J : An assessment of the efficacy of cancer genetic counselling using real-time videoconferencing technology (telemedicine) compared to face-to-face consultations. Eur J Cancer 2005; 41: 2257–2261.
Gray J, Brain K, Iredale R, Alderman J, France E, Hughes H : Letter to the editor: a pilot study of telegenetics. J Telemed Telecare 2000; 6: 245–247.
Hawkins AK, Creighton S, Ho A, McManus B, Hayden MR : Providing predictive testing for Huntington disease via telehealth: results of a pilot study in British Columbia, Canada. Clin Genet 2013; 84: 60–64.
Hopper B, Buckman M, Edwards M : Evaluation of satisfaction of parents with the use of videoconferencing for a pediatric genetic consultation. Twin Res Hum Genet 2011; 14: 343–346.
d’Agincourt-Canning L, McGillivray B, Panabaker K et al: Evaluation of genetic counseling for hereditary cancer by videoconference in British Columbia. BC Med J 2008; 50: 554–559.
Lea DH, Johnson JL, Ellingwood S, Allan W, Patel A, Smith R : Telegenetics in Maine: successful clinical and educational service delivery model developed from a 3-year pilot project. Genet Med 2005; 7: 21–27.
Gattas MR, MacMillan JC, Meinecke I, Loane M, Wootton R : Telemedicine and clinical genetics: establishing a successful service. J Telemed Telecare 2001; 7 (suppl 2): 68–70.
Yip MP, Chang AM, Chan J, MacKenzie AE : Development of the telemedicine satisfaction questionnaire to evaluate patient satisfaction with telemedicine: a preliminary study. J Telemed Telecare 2003; 9: 46–50.
Smets EM, Pieterse AH, Aalfs CM, Ausems MG, van Dulmen AM : The perceived personal control (PPC) questionnaire as an outcome of genetic counseling: reliability and validity of the instrument. Am J Med Genet 2006; 140: 843–850.
Van der Bij AK, de Weerd S, Cikot RJ, Steegers EA, Braspenning JC : Validation of the Dutch short form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: considerations for usage in screening outcomes. Community Genet 2003; 6: 84–87.
Marteau TM, Bekker H : The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol 1992; 31: 301–306.
Zellerino B, Milligan SA, Brooks R, Freedenberg DL, Collingridge DS, Williams MS : Development, testing, and validation of a patient satisfaction questionnaire for use in the clinical genetics setting. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2009; 151C: 191–199.
Gardner MR, Jenkins SM, O’Neil DA, Wood DL, Spurrier BR, Pruthi S : Perceptions of video-based appointments from the patient’s home: a patient survey. Telemed J E Health 2015; 21: 281–285.
Van de Belt TH, Engelen LJ, Berben SA, Teerenstra S, Samson M, Schoonhoven L : Internet and social media for health-related information and communication in healthcare: preferences of the Dutch general populations. J of Med Internet Research 2013; 15: e220.
Zilliacus E, Meiser B, Lobb E, Duddung TE, Barlow-Stewart K, Tucker K : The virtual consultation: practitioners’ experiences of genetic counseling by videoconferencing in Australia. Telemed J E Health 2010; 16: 350–357.
Hilgart JS, Hayward JA, Coles B, Iredale R : Telegenetics: a systematic review of telemedicine in genetics services. Genet Med 2012; 14: 765–776.
McDonald E, Lamb A, Grillo B, Lucas L, Miesfeldt S : Acceptability of telemedicine and other cancer genetic counseling models of service delivery in geographically remote settings. J Genet Counsel 2014; 23: 221–228.
Rothwell E, Kohlmann W, Jasperson K, Gammon A, Wong B, Kinney A : Patient outcomes associated with group and individual genetic counseling formats. Fam Cancer 2012; 11: 97–106.
Pieterse AH, van Dulmen AM, Beemer FA, Bensing JM, Ausems MG : Cancer genetic counseling: communication and counselees’ post-visit satisfaction, cognitions, anxiety, and needs fulfillment. J Genet Couns 2007; 16: 85–96.
Brain K, Gray J, Norman P et al: Randomized trial of a specialist genetic assessment service for familial breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 1345–1351.
Bish A, Sutton S, Jacobs C, Levene S, Ramirez A, Hodgson S : Changes in psychological distress after cancer genetic counselling: a comparison of affected and unaffected women. Br J Cancer 2002; 86: 43–50.
Zilliacus E, Meiser B, Lobb E, Barlow-Stewart K, Tucker K : A balancing act – telehealth cancer genetics and practitioners’ experiences of a triadic consultation. J Genet Counsel 2009; 18: 598–605.
Acknowledgements
This pilot project was facilitated by grants from the Innovation Fund of the Dutch health insurers and the European Social Fund (2010ESFN630), and by cooperation of Jack van Gils and his company ‘myCoachconnect’. We thank Theo van de Meer (‘De Praktijk’), Margot Woolderink and all patients, counsellors and case managers who participated in this project. Jackie Senior edited the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on European Journal of Human Genetics website
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Otten, E., Birnie, E., Ranchor, A. et al. Telegenetics use in presymptomatic genetic counselling: patient evaluations on satisfaction and quality of care. Eur J Hum Genet 24, 513–520 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2015.164
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2015.164
This article is cited by
-
Telehealth in genetic counselling consultations: the impact of COVID-19 in a Portuguese genetic healthcare service
Journal of Community Genetics (2022)
-
Patient Satisfaction and Healthcare Utilization Using Telemedicine in Liver Transplant Recipients
Digestive Diseases and Sciences (2019)
-
Factors influencing use of telegenetic counseling: perceptions of health care professionals in Sweden
Journal of Community Genetics (2019)
-
Comparison of Telephone and Televideo Modes for Delivery of Genetic Counseling: a Randomized Trial
Journal of Genetic Counseling (2018)
-
Implementing a Virtual Health Telemedicine Program in a Community Setting
Journal of Genetic Counseling (2018)
