Abstract
Purpose At present the Driver and Vehicle and Licensing Agency (DVLA) of the UK requires all diabetic patients with laser treatment in both eyes to undergo a binocular driving field assessment. Increasingly we find that many such patients have undergone only macular laser treatment without panretinal photocoagulation. We aimed to ascertain the frequency and causes of failure of the binocular driving field test after bilateral macular laser treatment performed according to a set protocol.
Methods A retrospective case notes study was combined with a prospective recall of patients for visual field assessment. All diabetic patients under the care of one consultant who had had bilateral macular laser treatment (without panretinal photocoagulation) over a 4 year period were identified and the case notes studied. Patients who could not achieve a corrected binocular acuity of 6/9 were excluded, as were patients with glaucoma. Patients who had not had the DVLA test were recalled to perform the test, whether or not they had an intention to drive. Failure was defined utilising strict criteria on the Esterman Programme of the Humphrey Analyser.
Results A total of 138 patients were identified. Fifty-four were not eligible (21 because of poor acuity, 29 had died or were too ill to participate and 4 for other reasons). Of the 84 who were eligible, 64 had visual fields performed and 20 declined to attend. Sixty-three of 64 tested passed the Esterman test, the one failure having a previously unknown and relatively mild homonymous field defect.
Conclusion Patients undergoing bilateral macular laser can be counselled that, provided their acuity remains adequate, they have a very low chance of failing the DVLA field regulations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Bailey CC, Sparrow JM, Grey RHB, Cheng H . The National Diabetic Retinopathy Laser Treatment Audit. 1. Maculopathy. Eye 1998;12:69–76.
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report Number 1. Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:1796–806.
Communication to drivers from the Driver and Vehicle and Licensing Agency (DVLA).
Buckley SA, Jenkins L, Benjamin L . Fields, DVLC and panretinal photocoagulation. Eye 1992;6:623–5.
Frier BM . Driving and diabetes. BMJ 1992;305:1238.
Hulbert MFG, Vernon SA . Passing the DVLA field regulations following bilateral pan-retinal photocoagulation in diabetics. Eye 1992;6:456–0.
Wood JM, Troutbeck R . Effect of restriction of the binocular visual field on driving performance. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1992;12:291–8.
Visual standards for driving. London: Royal College of Ophthalmologists, 1999.
Pearson AR, Keightley SJ, Casswell AG . How good are we at assessing driving visual fields in diabetes? Eye 1998;12:938--42.
Pearson AR, Tanner V, Keightley SJ, Caswell AG . What effect does laser photocoagulation have on driving visual fields in diabetes? Eye 1998;12:64-8.
Seiberth V, Alexandridis E, Feng W . Function of the diabetic retina after panretinal argon laser coagulation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1987;225:385–90.
Seiberth V, Alexandridis E . Function of the diabetic retina after pan-retinal argon laser photocoagulation: influence of the intensity of the coagulation spots. Ophthalmologia 1991;202:10–7.
Mackie SW, Webb LA, Hutchinson BM, Hammer HM, Barrie T, Walsh G . How much blame can be placed on laser photocoagulation for failure to attain driving standards? Eye 1995;9:517-25.
Okuyama M, Okisaka S, Ito M . Comparative study on frequency-doubled Nd:YAG laser, krypton laser and diode laser photocoagulation for diabetic maculopathy. Nippon Gauka Gakkai Zasshi 1995;99:87–92.
Schneider U, Kuck H, Kreissig I . Fixation and central visual field after perifoveal krypton laser treatment of subfoveal neovascularisations. Eur J Ophthalmol 1993;3:193–200.
Roth JA . Central visual fields in diabetes. Br J Ophthalmol 1969;53:16–25.
Trick GL, Trick LR, Kilo C . Visual field defects in patients with insulin-dependent and non-insulin dependent diabetes. Ophthalmology 1990;97:475–82.
Henricsson M, Heijl A . Visual fields at different stages of diabetic retinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1994;72:560–9.
Mastropasqua L, Verrotti A, Lobefalo L, Chiarelli F, Verdesca G, Morgese G . Visual field defects in diabetic children without retinopathy: relation between visual function and microalbuminuria. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1995;73:125–8.
Lutze M, Bresnick GH . Lens-corrected visual field sensitivity and diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994;35:649–55.
Midena E, Segato T, Blarzino MC, Degli Angeli C . Macular drusen and the sensitivity of the central visual field. Doc Ophthalmol 1994;88:179–85.
Tolentino MJ, Miller S, Gaudio AR, Sandberg MA . Visual field deficits in early age-related macular degeneration. Vision Res 1994;34:409–13.
Klein BE, Klein R, Jensen Sc . Open-angle glaucoma and older-onset diabetes. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1173–7.
Mosier MA, Deshmukh SS . Retinal sensitivity in acute hypoglycemia. Ophthalmologica 1990;201:99–103.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Proprietary interest: None
Grant support: None
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tong, L., Vernon, S. Passing the DVLA field regulations following bilateral macular photocoagulation in diabetics. Eye 14, 35–38 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2000.8
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2000.8
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Does macular laser alter the refraction in a diabetic with maculopathy? A pilot study
Eye (2001)
-
Letter
Eye (2000)
